Securities and Exchange Commission v. Small Business Capital Corp. et al
Filing
99
ORDER APPROVING RECEIVER'S THIRD INTERIM REPORT AND PETITION FOR INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/6/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SMALL BUSINESS CAPITAL CORP.;
15 MARK FEATHERS; INVESTORS PRIME
FUND, LLC; and SBC PORTFOLIO
16 FUND, LLC,
Case No. CV12-03237
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING
RECEIVER’S THIRD INTERIM REPORT
AND PETITION FOR INSTRUCTIONS
Ctrm: 4 - 5th Floor
Judge: Hon. Edward J. Davila
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble
Mallory & Natsis LLP
793417.01/SD
Case No. CV12-03237
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING
RECEIVER’S THIRD INTERIM REPORT
The Court having considered the Third Interim Report and Petition for Instructions
1
2 ("Report") of Thomas A. Seaman ("Receiver"), Court-appointed permanent receiver for Small
3 Business Capital Corp. ("SB Capital"), Investors Prime Fund, LLC ("IPF"), SBC Portfolio
4 Fund, LLC ("SPF"), and their subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, the "Receivership Entities"),
5 and good cause appearing therefor, hereby orders as follows:
6
1.
The Report is approved;
7
2.
The receivership shall continue pursuant to the Permanent Injunction Order entered
8 on July 10, 2012, and additional orders of the Court; and
3.
9
The Receiver's Fourth Interim Report shall be filed on or before January 15, 2013.
10
11 Dated:
November 6, 2012
Hon. Edward J. Davila
Judge, United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble
Mallory & Natsis LLP
793417.01/SD
Case No. CV12-03237
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING
RECEIVER’S THIRD INTERIM REPORT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?