Dunbar v. Google, Inc.
Filing
236
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting #235 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2012)
Case5:12-cv-03305-LHK Document235 Filed12/27/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) (rhodesmg@cooley.com)
WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463) (wsomvichian@cooley.com)
MACO STEWART (pro hac vice) (maco.stewart@cooley.com)
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
(415) 693-2000
Facsimile:
(415) 693-2222
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
Case No. 12-CV-03305-LHK (PSG)
KEITH DUNBAR,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME FOR ANSWER TO
PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED CLASS
ACTION COMPLAINT
GOOGLE, INC.,
15
Judge:
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
Courtroom: 8, 4th Floor
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
This Stipulation is entered into pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, by and between Plaintiff Keith
Dunbar (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and
through the respective undersigned counsel.
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2012, Plaintiff filed and served Plaintiff’s Third Amended
Class Action Complaint (“Plaintiff’s TAC”) (Dkt. 228);
WHEREAS, under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(d) and 15(a)(3), Google’s response
would be due on New Year’s Eve, and Google’s time to prepare its response would span the
Christmas holiday;
WHEREAS, the proximity of the holidays makes Google’s preparation of its answer to
Plaintiff’s TAC within the allotted time unusually burdensome;
WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 6-2, the Parties may stipulate in writing to request an
28
1299341 /SF
1.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME FOR ANSWER
12-CV-03305-LHK (PSG)
Case5:12-cv-03305-LHK Document235 Filed12/27/12 Page2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
extension of the time for a deadline set by the Local Rules or the Federal Rules;
WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties agree that extending the briefing schedule will permit
Google to take additional care in answering Plaintiff’s TAC;
WHEREAS, extending the dates for Google’s answer as set forth below will not alter any
deadline already fixed by Court order;
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree and request that Google’s deadline to file its
answer to Plaintiff’s TAC be extended until January 14, 2013.
8
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
10
11
Dated: December 26, 2012
COOLEY LLP
WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463)
12
13
/s/ Whitty Somvichian
14
Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC.
15
Dated: December 26, 2012
16
WYLY-ROMMEL, PLLC
SEAN F. ROMMEL (pro hac vice)
17
/s/ Sean F. Rommel
18
Attorneys for Plaintiff Keith Dunbar
19
20
WYLY-ROMMEL, PLLC
SEAN F. ROMMEL (pro hac vice)
srommel@wylyrommel.com
JAMES C. WYLY (pro hac vice)
jwyly@wylyrommel.com
4004 Texas Boulevard
Texarkana, TX 75503
Telephone: (903) 334-8646
Facsimile: (903) 334-8645
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1299341 /SF
2.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME FOR ANSWER
12-CV-03305-LHK (PSG)
Case5:12-cv-03305-LHK Document235 Filed12/27/12 Page3 of 3
1
CLAYEO C. ARNOLD
A Professional Law Corporation
CLAYEO C. ARNOLD (SBN 65070)
KIRK J. WOLDEN (SBN 138902)
kwolden@justice4you.com
CLIFFORD L. CARTER (SBN 149621)
ccarter@justice4you.com
865 Howe Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: (916) 924-3100
Facsimile: (916) 924-1829
2
3
4
5
6
7
CORY WATSON CROWDER & DEGARIS, P.C.
F. Jerome Tapley (pro hac vice)
jtapley@cwcd.com
Hirlye R. Lutz, III (pro hac vice)
rlutz@cwcd.com
2131 Magnolia Avenue
Birmingham, AL 35205
Telephone: (205) 328-2200
Facsimile: (205) 324-7896
8
9
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff KEITH DUNBAR
14
15
16
17
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
December 28, 2012
Dated: __________________, 2012
____________________________________
THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
21
22
23
Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, Whitty
Somvichian hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
24
25
26
27
28
1299341 /SF
3.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME FOR ANSWER
12-CV-03305-LHK (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?