Be In, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER Continuing Hearing on Motion to Dismiss by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 26 Stipulation (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 United States District Court 9 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 BE IN, INC., a New York Corporation, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 v. GOOGLE INC., a California corporation; RICHARD ROBINSON, an individual, and Does 1 through 3 inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 5:12-cv-3373-LHK ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 19 20 On December 13, 2012, the parties in this action filed a stipulation and proposed order 21 seeking to reschedule the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Be In, Inc.’s Third and Fourth 22 Causes of Action scheduled for January 3, 2013, and to continue the initial case management 23 conference scheduled for the same day. ECF No. 26. The Court GRANTS the parties’ stipulation 24 to reschedule the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and to continue the initial case 25 management conference. However, the Court is not available to hear this motion on February 28, 26 2013. Accordingly, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Be In, Inc.’s Third and Fourth 27 28 1 Case No.: 12-CV-03163-LHK ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 1 Causes of Action and the initial case management conference are CONTINUED to April 18, 2013, 2 at 1:30 p.m. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: December 17, 2012 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-03163-LHK ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?