Be In, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al
Filing
32
ORDER REQUIRING BE IN, INC. TO FILE A NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 3/06/2013. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
United States District Court
9
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13
BE IN, INC., a New York Corporation,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
v.
GOOGLE INC., a California corporation;
RICHARD ROBINSON, an individual, and
Does 1 through 3 inclusive,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 5:12-CV-03373-LHK
ORDER REQUIRING BE IN, INC. TO
FILE A NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION
OF COUNSEL
On February 19, 2013, counsel for Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to
Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff. See ECF No. 28 (“Mot.”). Plaintiff’s counsel contends that
good cause exists to permit Movants’ withdrawal of counsel of record because “Be In has breached
and remains in breach of agreements with or obligation to Movants as to expenses and fees.” Mot.
at 2. Movants also assert that they have taken reasonable steps to avoid foreseeable prejudice to Be
In. Id. at 4. Further, Movants state that Be In has “located replacement counsel, although the
substitution has not yet been executed.” Id. On March 5, 2013, Defendants filed a Statement of
Non-Opposition to Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff. ECF No. 29.
27
28
1
Case No.: 5:12-CV-03373-LHK
ORDER REQUIRING BE IN, INC. TO FILE A NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-9(b), “[a] corporation, unincorporated association,
2
partnership or other such entity may appear only through a member of the bar of this Court.”
3
Therefore, Be In, Inc., a New York corporation, cannot represent itself in this matter. See Rowland
4
v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 202-03 (1993) (holding
5
that only natural persons can petition courts themselves and appear pro se); see also Licht v.
6
America West Airlines, 40 F.3d 1058, 1059 (9th Cir.1994) (“Corporations ... must appear in court
7
through an attorney.”). Thus, by March 13, 2013, Be In, Inc. shall file a Notice of Substitution of
8
Counsel.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
Dated: March 6, 2013
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 5:12-CV-03373-LHK
ORDER REQUIRING BE IN, INC. TO FILE A NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?