Sunnyvale Imaging Center v. CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company

Filing 63

ORDER DECLINING TO APPROVE 61 JOINT STIPULATION SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 5/28/2014. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 SUNNYVALE IMAGING CENTER, 9 Case No. 12-cv-03404-BLF Plaintiff, 10 v. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 ORDER DECLINING TO APPROVE JOINT STIPULATION SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) [Re: ECF 61] 14 On May 23, 2014, Defendant MedSolutions, Inc. (“MedSolutions”) filed a joint stipulation 15 16 and proposed order purporting to dismiss all claims against it pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 17 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).1 Under that provision, a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court 18 order by filing “a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. 19 P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). In this case, the stipulation does not comply with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) because, 20 although it is signed by Plaintiff and MedSolutions, it is not signed Defendant Cigna Health and 21 Life Insurance Company. Accordingly, the Court DECLINES to sign the proposed order 22 approving the stipulation. The Court notes that should the parties file a renewed joint stipulation that complies with 23 24 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), i.e., that is signed by all parties that have appeared, such stipulation would be 25 effective to dismiss the claims against MedSolutions without the need for a court order. See Fed. 26 27 28 1 The stipulation actually references Rule “41(a)(1)(ii),” but the Court presumes that the intended reference is Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 5:12-cv-03404-BLF ORDER DECLINING TO APPROVE JOINT STIPULATION 1 2 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: 5/28/2014 ___________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?