City of Capitola v. Lexington Insurance Company
Filing
71
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh finding as moot 62 Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time ; finding as moot 63 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; granting 70 Stipulation to Enlarge Time (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
CITY OF CAPITOLA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY,
and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 5:12-CV-03428-LHK
ORDER GRANTING SECOND
STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE
TIME AND DENYING AS MOOT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ENLARGE
TIME AND MOTION TO SHORTEN
TIME
A hearing for Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is currently scheduled for
July 18, 2013.
On March 22, 2013, Defendant Lexington filed (1) a Motion to Enlarge Time to Oppose
Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF No. 63, requesting to extend the deadline
from March 29, 2013 to May 24, 2013, and (2) a Motion to Shorten Time on Motion to Enlarge
24
Time, ECF No. 62. On March 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed an objection to Defendant’s Motion to
25
Shorten Time. ECF No. 25. Also on March 25, 2013, Defendant filed a Response to Plaintiff’s
26
27
28
Objection. ECF No. 66.
-1ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME AND DENYING AS MOOT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME AND MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-03428-LHK
1
On March 28, 2013, the parties filed a Second Stipulated Request for an Order Enlarging
2
Time for Opposition to Partial Summary Judgment Motion, stipulating to enlarge Defendant’s
3
time to oppose summary judgment until April 5, 2013, with Plaintiff’s Reply now due on April
4
19, 2013. ECF No. 70. The parties indicate that good cause exists to grant the stipulated
5
extension because parties are actively engaged in productive settlement negotiations.
6
The parties’ stipulation is hereby GRANTED, and Defendant’s Motion to Enlarge Time
7
and Motion to Shorten Time are DENIED as moot. Any future motions to change time shall
8
comply with Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 6.
9
10
11
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 28, 2013
Honorable Lucy H. Koh
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME AND DENYING AS MOOT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME AND MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-03428-LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?