City of Capitola v. Lexington Insurance Company

Filing 83

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 79 Stipulated Request to Enlarge Time.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CITY OF CAPITOLA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 ) Case No.: 5:12-CV-03428-LHK ) ) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED ) REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME ) ) ) ) ) ) ) A hearing for Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is currently scheduled for July 18, 2013. On March 28, 2013, the Court granted the Parties’ Second Stipulated Request for an 20 Order Enlarging Time for Opposition to Partial Summary Judgment Motion, and denied as moot 21 Defendant’s pending Motion to Enlarge Time and Motion to Shorten Time. ECF No. 71. The 22 Court noted in that Order that any future motions to change time shall comply with Northern 23 District of California Civil Local Rule 6. Civil Local Rule 6 provides in relevant part that any 24 stipulated request for an order changing time must be accompanied by a declaration that (1) sets 25 forth with particularity, the reasons for the requested enlargement or shortening of time; (2) 26 discloses all previous time modifications in the case, whether by stipulation or Court order; and 27 28 -1ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME CASE NO. 5:12-CV-03428-LHK 1 (3) describes the effect the requested time modification would have on the schedule for the case. 2 See Civ. L. R. 6-2(a). 3 On April 11, 2013, the parties filed a Stipulated Request for an Order Enlarging Time for 4 Exchange of Expert Reports. ECF No. 79. The stipulation does not include a declaration, nor 5 does it address the multiple previous time modifications in this case. The parties do indicate that 6 good cause exists to grant the stipulated extension because the parties are actively engaged in 7 productive settlement negotiations. 8 9 The parties’ stipulation is hereby GRANTED. However, any future motions to change time in this case will be disfavored. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: April 15, 2013 12 Honorable Lucy H. Koh 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO ENLARGE TIME CASE NO. 5:12-CV-03428-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?