Realtek Semiconductor Corporation v. LSI Corporation et al

Filing 247

Draft Jury Verdict Form. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/31/14. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR, CORPORATION, 13 Case No. C-12-3451-RMW Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 [DRAFT] JURY VERDICT FORM LSI CORPORATION AND AGERE SYSTEMS LLC, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 DETERMINATION OF RAND ROYALTY RATE FOR ’958 AND ’867 PATENTS 1. What do you find is the reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) royalty rate for the ’958 Patent? 22 a. ongoing royalty payment of $____ [per unit sold]; or 23 b. ongoing royalty payment of ____% of total sales. 24 25 2. What do you find is the reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) royalty rate for the ’867 Patent? 26 a. ongoing royalty payment of $____ [per unit sold]; or 27 b. ongoing royalty payment of ____% of total sales. 28 DRAFT JURY VERDICT FORM Case No. C-12-3451-RMW RDS -1- 1 2 FINDINGS ON BREACH OF CONTRACT DAMAGES 3. Has Plaintiff sustained damages as a foreseeable result of Defendants’ breach of their 3 contractual commitments? 4 YES ______ NO ______ 5 4. If you answered “YES” to Question No. 2, what is the amount of damages that Plaintiff 6 sustained? 7 $________________ dollars 8 9 Dated: ____________ _________________________________ Presiding Juror United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRAFT JURY VERDICT FORM Case No. C-12-3451-RMW RDS -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?