Realtek Semiconductor Corporation v. LSI Corporation et al
Filing
247
Draft Jury Verdict Form. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/31/14. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR,
CORPORATION,
13
Case No. C-12-3451-RMW
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
[DRAFT] JURY VERDICT FORM
LSI CORPORATION AND AGERE
SYSTEMS LLC,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
DETERMINATION OF RAND ROYALTY RATE FOR ’958 AND ’867 PATENTS
1. What do you find is the reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) royalty rate for the ’958
Patent?
22
a. ongoing royalty payment of $____ [per unit sold]; or
23
b. ongoing royalty payment of ____% of total sales.
24
25
2. What do you find is the reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) royalty rate for the ’867
Patent?
26
a. ongoing royalty payment of $____ [per unit sold]; or
27
b. ongoing royalty payment of ____% of total sales.
28
DRAFT JURY VERDICT FORM
Case No. C-12-3451-RMW
RDS
-1-
1
2
FINDINGS ON BREACH OF CONTRACT DAMAGES
3. Has Plaintiff sustained damages as a foreseeable result of Defendants’ breach of their
3
contractual commitments?
4
YES ______ NO ______
5
4. If you answered “YES” to Question No. 2, what is the amount of damages that Plaintiff
6
sustained?
7
$________________ dollars
8
9
Dated: ____________
_________________________________
Presiding Juror
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRAFT JURY VERDICT FORM
Case No. C-12-3451-RMW
RDS
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?