Realtek Semiconductor Corporation v. LSI Corporation et al
Filing
333
ORDER Setting Equitable Relief and Post-Trial Motions Schedules. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/12/14. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR,
CORPORATION,
13
Case No. C-12-3451-RMW
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
ORDER SETTING EQUITABLE
RELIEF AND POST-TRIAL
MOTIONS SCHEDULES
LSI CORPORATION AND AGERE
SYSTEMS LLC,
16
17
[Re: Dkt. No. 326]
Defendants.
18
19
The Court finds that briefing on the equitable issues surrounding potential entry of a
20
permanent injunction is necessary. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b) and 59(b) state that
21
motions for judgment as a matter of law and new trial motions must be filed “[n]o later than 28 days
22
after the entry of judgment.” This language sets a final time limit after which motions for judgment
23
as a matter of law and new trial motions will be barred. See, e.g., Riggs v. Scrivner, Inc., 927 F.2d
24
1146, 1148 (10th Cir. 1991). As such, Rules 50(b) and 59(b) do not appear to preclude such motions
25
being filed before judgment is entered.
26
27
In the interest of efficiency, the court sets the following schedule for Realtek’s motion for
equitable relief and the parties’ post-trial motions under Rules 50 and 59:
28
ORDER RE POST-TRIAL BRIEFING
Case No. C-12-3451-RMW
RDS
-1-
1
Realtek’s motion for equitable relief:
March 28, 2014
2
Post-trial motions:
March 28, 2014
3
Oppositions due:
April 11, 2014
4
Replies due:
April 18, 2014
5
Hearing:
May 9, 2014
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: March 12, 2014
_________________________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER RE POST-TRIAL BRIEFING
Case No. C-12-3451-RMW
RDS
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?