Realtek Semiconductor Corporation v. LSI Corporation et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER 31 Selecting ADR Process. Case Referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 10/3/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10
11
12
13
14

Scott D. Baker (SBN 84923)
Email: [e-mail]
William R. Overend (SBN 180209)
Email: [e-mail]
Adrian Sue Shin (SBN 256960)
Email: [e-mail]
James A. Daire (SBN 239637)
Email: [e-mail]
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Steven S. Baik (SBN 184622)
Email: [e-mail]
Carina M. Tan (SBN 185015)
[e-mail]
REED SMITH LLP
1510 Page Mill Road, Suite 110
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON
LLP
DAVID E. SIPIORA (State Bar No. 124951)
1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600
Denver, CO 80202-5556
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON
LLP
ROBERT J. ARTUZ (State Bar No. 227789)
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants LSI CORPORATION
and AGERE SYSTEMS LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff
REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN JOSE DIVISION

19
20

REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,

21
22
23

Case No. 5:12-cv-03451 RMW
STIPULATION AND []
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

vs.
LSI CORPORATION
and AGERE SYSTEMS LLC,

24

Defendants.

25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:12-CV-03451 RMW

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

2
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10

Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR
Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
X
Private ADR (please identify process and provider): The parties agree to
mediation by a private mediator, such as one provided by JAMS.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
X

other requested deadline: In light of ongoing ITC proceedings between the
parties, the parties agree that it would not be productive to engage in mediation
within 90 days from the date of this Order. The parties have agreed to defer the
deadline until 90 days after the close of fact discovery in this case.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: September 13, 2012.

18

REED SMITH LLP

19

By

20
21

/s/ James A. Daire
James A. Daire
Attorney for Plaintiff
REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

22

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

23

By

24
25

/s/ Robert J. Artuz*
David E. Sipiora
Robert J. Artuz
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI CORPORATION and
AGERE SYSTEMS LLC

26
*Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)
regarding signatures, Robert J. Artuz hereby attests
that concurrence in the filing of this document has
been obtained.

27
28
Case No. 5:12-CV-03451 RMW

–1–

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

[] ORDER

1
2
3
4
5

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: A private
mediator mutually agreed to by the parties.
Deadline for ADR session: The parties agree that the deadline for private mediation is 90
days after the close of fact discovery in this case.

6
7

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

8
9

DATED: ___________, 2012.

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10
11

Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Court Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:12-CV-03451 RMW

–2–

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS