Realtek Semiconductor Corporation v. LSI Corporation et al

Filing 75

Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte granting 74 Stipulation (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Scott D. Baker (SBN 84923)
Email: [e-mail]
William R. Overend (SBN 180209)
Email: [e-mail]
Adrian Sue Shin (SBN 256960)
Email: [e-mail]
James A. Daire (SBN 239637)
Email: [e-mail]
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
David E. Sipiora (State Bar No. 124951)
1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600
Denver, CO 80202-5556
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Steven S. Baik (SBN 184622)
Email: [e-mail]
Carina M. Tan (SBN 185015)
[e-mail]
REED SMITH LLP
1510 Page Mill Road, Suite 110
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
Charles A. Pannell, III (Appearing Pro Hac Vice)
1100 Peachtree St.
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
Robert J. Artuz (State Bar No. 227789)
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendants LSI CORPORATION and
AGERE SYSTEMS LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff
REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION

16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

SAN JOSE DIVISION

20
21

REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,

22
23
24

v.

Case No. C 12-03451 RMW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SHORTENING TIME OF
BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY

Defendant.

Date:
Time:
Place:

May 3, 2013
9:00 AM
Courtroom 6, 4th Floor

Judge:

25

LSI CORPORATION, et al.,

Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME OF BRIEFING
SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY
CASE NO. C 12-03451 RMW

1

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Defendants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC

2

(collectively “Defendants”) and Plaintiff Realtek Semiconductor Corporation (“Plaintiff”) hereby

3

move for an order shortening the briefing deadlines in connection with Defendants’ motion to stay

4

the current action (“Defendants’ Motion”), filed concurrently with this Stipulation.

5
6

WHEREAS Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Realtek Motion,”
Dkt. No. 67), scheduled to be heard on May 3, 2013.

7

WHEREAS Defendants’ lead counsel will be in trial after May 3, 2013.

8

WHEREAS the parties would rather avoid delay in scheduling a hearing for Defendants’

9
10

Motion until after the conclusion of Defendants’ lead counsel’s trial.
WHEREAS Plaintiff’s counsel has agreed to shorten the response deadline to April 17,

11

2013 and the corresponding reply deadline to April 22, 2013 in order to consolidate the hearings

12

for both motions, and retain the original May 3, 2013 hearing date.

13

WHEREAS the parties’ stipulation does not affect the May 3, 2013 hearing date or any

14

other date already fixed by Court order, and does not accelerate or extend any other time frames

15

set in the Local Rules or in the Federal Rules.

16
17

IT IS STIPULATED by the parties that:
•

Plaintiff’s response brief in opposition to the Defendants’ Motion is due on
April 17, 2013; and

•

Defendants’ reply brief, in support of Defendants’ Motion is due on April 22,
2013.

18
19
20

Respectfully submitted,

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Dated: April 4, 2013

REED SMITH LLP
By: /s/ James A. Daire
Scott D. Baker
William R. Overend
James A. Daire
Adrian Sue Shin
Attorneys for Plaintiff
REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME OF BRIEFING
SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY
CASE NO. C 12-03451 RMW

1

1

Dated: April 4, 2013

2

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
By: /s/ Charles A. Pannell, III
David E. Sipora
Robert J. Artuz
Charles A. Pannell, III

3
4

Attorneys for Defendants
LSI CORPORATION and AGERE SYSTEMS LLC

5
6
7
8
9
10

Filer’s Attestation
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Charles A. Pannell, hereby attests that the abovenamed signatories concur in this filing.
DATED: April 4, 2013
/s/ Charles A. Pannell, III
Charles A. Pannell, III

11
12
13

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
April 5, 2013
Dated:_______________________

14
15

HON. RONALD M. WHYTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17

65337326V.1

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME OF BRIEFING
SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY
CASE NO. C 12-03451 RMW

2