Noise Free Wireless, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING re 19 Stipulation TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT filed by Apple, Inc. Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall beextended to and including September 14, 2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/5/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2012)

9

Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

ER

J . D av i l

R NIA

S

d w a rd
J u d ge E

H

8

RT

7

NO

6

a

FO

5

I

LI

4

ERED

ORD
T IS SO

A

3

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

2

William C. Rooklidge (State Bar No. 134483)
[e-mail]
Martha K. Gooding (State Bar No. 101638)
[e-mail]
Frank P. Coté (State Bar No. 204529)
[e-mail]
Michelle Stover (State Bar No. 272817)
[e-mail]
JONES DAY
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 800
Irvine, CA 92612.4408
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

UNIT
ED

1

N

D IS T IC T
R

10

9/5/2012

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

OF

SAN JOSE DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18

NOISE FREE WIRELESS, INC., A Delaware
Corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE INC. and AUDIENCE, INC.,

Case No. 5:12-cv-03483 EJD
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
PENDING REASSIGNMENT

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IRI-42362v1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CV12-03483 EJD

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Noise Free Wireless, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and

2

Defendants Apple Inc. and Audience, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby stipulate and agree

3

as follows:

4

1. Pursuant to the parties’ July 27, 2012 and July 31, 2012 Stipulations (Dkt. Nos. 9 and

5

11), Defendants’ current deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action

6

is August 31, 2012;

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

2. Defendants have requested, and Plaintiff has agreed to, a further brief extension of time
to respond to the Complaint;
3. Defendants’ deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be
extended to and including September 14, 2012;
4. This Stipulation shall not constitute a waiver or forfeiture of any defense or allegation
by any party, and all parties reserve all rights with respect to the above-captioned matter.
5. The stipulated extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already
fixed by Court order.

15
16

Dated: August 31, 2012

17

Respectfully submitted,
JONES DAY

18
19

By: /s/ Martha K. Gooding
Martha K. Gooding

20

Counsel for Defendant
APPLE INC.

21
22
23

Dated: August 31, 2012

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

24
By: /s/ Ryan R. Smith
Ryan R. Smith

25
26

Counsel for Defendant
AUDIENCE, INC.

27
28
IRI-42362v1

-1-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CV12-03483 EJD

1
2

Dated: August 31, 2012

3

By: /s/ Mateo Zavaletta Fowler
Mateo Zavaletta Fowler

4
5

Counsel for Plaintiff
NOISE FREE WIRELESS, INC.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

WOOLF GAFNI AND FOWLER LLP

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, section X(B), and Local Rule 5.1(i)(3), I attest under
penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Mateo Z.
Fowler, counsel for Plaintiff, and Ryan Smith, counsel for Defendant Audience.
Dated: August 31, 2012

13

By: /s/ Martha K. Gooding
Martha K. Gooding

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IRI-42362v1

-2-

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CV12-03483 EJD