Pennix v. IAP World Services

Filing 18

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 17 Stipulation Regarding Dismissal of Plaintiff's State Law Claims.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

Erica K. Rocush, State Bar No. 262354
[e-mail]
Krystal N. LoPilato, CA Bar No. 263320
[e-mail],
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870

6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendant IAP Worldwide Services, Inc. (erroneously
sued herein as “IAP World Services”)

11

Angela Alioto, State Bar No. 130328
Steven L. Robinson, State Bar No. 116146
LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH L. ALIOTO AND ANGELA ALIOTO
700 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 9411
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.438.4638

12

Attorneys for Plaintiff Tyrone Pennix

9
10

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16

TYRONE A. PENNIX,

17

Plaintiff,

18

v.

Case No. CV 12-03520 LHK
STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL
OF PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

19 IAP WORLD SERVICES,
Action Filed:
20

July 6, 2012

Defendant.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Plaintiff Tyrone Pennix (“Pennix”) and Defendant IAP Worldwide Services, Inc. (“IAP”),
by and through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that each and every state law claim brought
by Pennix in this action be dismissed with prejudice. Such dismissal is premised on preemption of
such state law claims under the federal enclave doctrine. Accordingly, Pennix and IAP stipulate
and request that the Court dismiss Pennix’s second, fourth, sixth, seventh and tenth claims for
relief, with prejudice.

28
1
Case No. CV 12-03520 LHK
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Such dismissal shall have no effect on or in any way prejudice Pennix’s remaining causes

2 of action, namely the first, third, fifth, eighth, and ninth claims for relief brought in Pennix’s
3 Complaint.
4
5 DATED: January 30, 2013

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.

6
7
8

By:

9
10

/s/ ERICA K. ROCUSH
Erica K. Rocush
Krystal N. LoPilato
Attorneys for Defendant
IAP Worldwide Services, Inc. (erroneously sued
herein as “IAP World Services”)

11
12
13

DATED: January 30, 2013

LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH L. ALIOTO AND
ANGELA ALIOTO

14
15
16

By:

17

/s/ STEVEN L. ROBINSON
Angela Alioto
Steven L. Robinson

18

Attorneys for Plaintiff Tyrone Pennix

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. CV 12-03520 LHK
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation Regarding Dismissal of Plaintiff’s State Law Claims, and good

3 cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby orders that:
4

Plaintiff’s second, fourth, sixth, seventh, and tenth claims for relief are hereby dismissed

5 with prejudice. Such dismissal shall have no effect on and be without prejudice to Plaintiff’s first,
6 third, fifth, eighth and ninth claims for relief.
7
8 Dated: February 5, 2013
HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13

14106227.1 (OGLETREE)

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. CV 12-03520 LHK
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER