Moore et al v. Petsmart,Inc et al

Filing 108

ORDER re: 91 , 92 Plaintiffs' Motions for Attorneys' Fees. On or before 3/9/2015 at 2:00 p.m., Plaintiffs shall lodge with the court, but shall not file, a copy of all billing records supporting the request for attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/5/2015. (ejdlc4S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2015) Modified on 3/5/2015 (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

SAN JOSE DIVISION

7
8

DANETTE M. MOORE, et al.,

Case No. 5:12-cv-03577-EJD

Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS
FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

9
v.
10
11

PETSMART, INC,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 91, 92

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendant.
12
13
14

Presently before the court are Plaintiffs Jeanette Negrete, Alanna Harrison, Alisa Valdez,

15

Danette Moore, and Latresa Myers’ Motions for Attorneys’ Fees. See Dkt. Nos. 91, 92. Pursuant

16

to local guidelines, requests for approval of attorneys’ fees awards must include detailed lodestar

17

information, even if the requested amount is based on a percentage of the settlement fund. See

18

Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements, United States District Court, Northern District

19

of California, http://cand.uscourts.gov/ClassActionSettlementGuidance.

20

Accordingly, on or before March 9, 2015 at 2:00 p.m., Plaintiffs shall lodge with the

21

court, but shall not file, a copy of all billing records supporting the request for attorneys’ fees.

22
23
24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 5, 2015
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

27
28

1
Case No.: 5:12-cv-03577-EJD
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES