Moore et al v. Petsmart,Inc et al
Filing
43
ORDER RE: 42 EX PARTE APPLICATION. Any opposition to the application shall be filed on or before 4:00 p.m. on 2/18/2014. The court will not consider a reply brief and reply briefs should not be filed. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the application will then be submitted for decision based on the briefing. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/14/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-03577 EJD
DANETTE M. MOORE, et. al., individually
and on behalf of others similarly situated,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION
12
Plaintiff(s),
v.
13
PETSMART, INC.,
14
15
Defendant(s).
/
16
17
18
19
With regard to proposed intervenor’s ex parte application filed February 13, 2014 (see
Docket Item No. 42), the court orders as follows:
1.
Any opposition to the application shall be filed on or before 4:00 p.m. on February
20
18, 2014. The court will not consider a reply brief and reply briefs should not be
21
filed.
22
23
2.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the application will then be submitted for
decision based on the briefing.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: February 14, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-03577 EJD
ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?