Moore et al v. Petsmart,Inc et al

Filing 43

ORDER RE: 42 EX PARTE APPLICATION. Any opposition to the application shall be filed on or before 4:00 p.m. on 2/18/2014. The court will not consider a reply brief and reply briefs should not be filed. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the application will then be submitted for decision based on the briefing. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/14/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:12-cv-03577 EJD DANETTE M. MOORE, et. al., individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION 12 Plaintiff(s), v. 13 PETSMART, INC., 14 15 Defendant(s). / 16 17 18 19 With regard to proposed intervenor’s ex parte application filed February 13, 2014 (see Docket Item No. 42), the court orders as follows: 1. Any opposition to the application shall be filed on or before 4:00 p.m. on February 20 18, 2014. The court will not consider a reply brief and reply briefs should not be 21 filed. 22 23 2. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the application will then be submitted for decision based on the briefing. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: February 14, 2014 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-03577 EJD ORDER RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?