Campbell et al v. Hunter Engineering Company
Filing
48
ORDER directing Zurich American Insurance Company to reset the briefing schedule and renotice its motion for an order granting leave to intervene 47 for hearing before the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on July 8, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2013)
*E-FILED: July 8, 2013*
1
2
3
4
5
NOT FOR CITATION
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
TYRONE CAMPBELL ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
No. C12-03777 HRL
ORDER
HUNTER ENGINEERING COMPANY ET
AL.,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
13
14
Pursuant to the reassignment of this case to the undersigned for all purposes, the parties are
15
directed to renotice all pending motions for hearing before Magistrate Judge Lloyd. As Zurich
16
American Insurance Company’s motion for an order granting leave to intervene (Dkt. 47) did not
17
appear on the Court’s electronic docketing system until July 3, 2013, Zurich American Insurance
18
Company shall also reset the briefing schedule on its motion.
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 8, 2013
21
22
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
C 12-03777 Order will be electronically mailed to:
2
Coleman Everett Ramsey Cole_Ramsey@shww.com
3
Gregory Alexander Nelson gnelson@donahuedavies.com
4
Jeffrey David Janoff jdj@janofflaw.com, ang@janofflaw.com
5
Mary Alma Stewart mstewart@donahuedavies.com
6
Robert Edmund Davies rdavies@donahuedavies.com
7
Steven Edward Garlock sgarlock@thompsoncoburn.com, dwoll@thompsoncoburn.com
8
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?