Lusby v. Gamestop, Inc et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 Stipulation to Continue Deadline to File Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement filed by Gamestop, Inc, Gamestop Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/5/2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2013)

Download PDF
*E-Filed: November 5, 2013* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP CARRIE A. GONELL (SBN 257163) cgonell@morganlewis.com JOHN D. HAYASHI (SBN 211077) jhayashi@morganlewis.com NEAL A. FISHER JR. (SBN265596) neal.fisher@morganlewis.com 5 Park Plaza Suite 1750 Irvine, CA 92614 Tel: 949.399.7000 Fax: 949.399.7001 Attorneys for Defendants GAMESTOP, INC. and GAMESTOP CORP. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 THOMAS LUSBY, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated,, CLASS ACTION 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 CASE NO. CV-12-03783-HRL [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. GAMESTOP, INC.; GAMESTOP Corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 17 Defendants. Hearing Date: Dec. 12, 2013 Time: 10:00 A.M. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1 IRVINE DB2/ 24501912.1 PROPOSED ORDER CV-12-03783-HRL 1 PROPOSED ORDER 2 Based on the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause appearing: 3 1. 4 The deadline for Plaintiffs to file the Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement is continued to November 12, 2013. 5 2. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing date of December 12, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. shall remain unchanged. 7 8 9 Dated: November ___, 2013 5 By Hon. Howard R. Lloyd U.S. District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2 IRVINE DB2/ 24501912.1 PROPOSED ORDER CV-12-03783-HRL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?