Siegel v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 42

STIPULATION AND ORDER (AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT) continuing briefing schedule and hearing on motion for summary judgment. Motion Hearing set for 7/30/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose before Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on June 6, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2013)

*E-FILED: June 6, 2013*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Karen E. Ford Esq.
SW Ocean Ave & Mission, Suite 208
P.O. Box 287
Carmel-by-the-Sea, California 93921-0287
831-250-6433
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
SBN 88358
Attorney for Plaintiff Peter Siegel
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
MELINDA S. RIECHERT, (SBN 65504)
[e-mail]
2 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
ADELMISE ROSEMÉ WARNER (SBN 215385)
[e-mail]
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

17
18

United States District Court
Northern District of California

19
20
21

Peter Siegel,
Plaintiff,

22
23
24
25

vs.
Hewlett-Packard Company,
Defendant

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No: 5:12-cv-03787 HRL
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGEMENT

26
27
28

Stipulation and Order Continuing MSJ - 1

1

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

2
3

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 the parties, by an through their undersigned

4

counsel, hereby stipulate to entry of an order continuing the Motion for Summary Judgment filed

5

by Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) in this matter as set out below. Plaintiff’s

6

grounds for seeking this continuance are set out in the Declarations of Counsel filed in this action

7

with this stipulation and on April 4, 2013. Both parties agree to continuance on the grounds that

8

Plaintiff has not completed discovery he wishes to conduct in order to respond to Defendant’s

9

Motion for Summary Judgment. In entering into this stipulation Defendant is not waiving any

10

right to subsequently dispute the facts and contentions set out in Plaintiff’s April 4, 2013 Motion

11

for Continuance and the related Declaration of Counsel. Specifically, the parties stipulate as

12

follows:

13

30
The Motion for Summary Judgment shall be heard at 10:00 AM on Tuesday, July 23,

14

2013; and

15

Any Opposition by Plaintiff to the Motion for Summary Judgment will be filed and

16

served not later than July 9, 2013; and

17

Any Reply by Defendant to be filed and served not later than July 16, 2013.

18
19
20

Dated this 3rd day of June, 2013

21
22

/s/
Karen E. Ford Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
Peter Siegel

23
24
25
26
27

Date: ___________________________

28

Stipulation and Order Continuing MSJ - 2

1

/s/
Adelmise Rosemé Warner
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Attorney for Defendant
Hewlett-Packard Company

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

ORDER
AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT,
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,
^

9
10
11
12

June 6, 2013
Dated: ____________________
_______________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD
United States Magistrate Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Stipulation and Order Continuing MSJ - 3