Levi Strauss & Co v. D&K S.r.l

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER 20 Continuing Hearing on Motion to Dismiss. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 17 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . Motion Hearing set for 1/11/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/29/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
GREGORY S. GILCHRIST (Bar # 111536)
GIA L. CINCONE (Bar # 141668)
Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.

7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.,

Case No. CV 12-03792 RMW

12
Plaintiff,

STIPULATION AND []
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON
MOTION TO DISMISS

13
v.
14
D&K S.R.L.,

DATE: Nov. 30, 2012
TIME: 9:00 a.m.
COURTROOM: 6
HON. RONALD M. WHYTE

15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19

The parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

20

Plaintiff Levi Strauss & Co. (“LS&Co.”) filed this action on July 19, 2012. By agreement of

21

the parties, the deadline for Defendant D&K S.r.l. (“D&K”) to respond to the complaint was set for

22

September 18, 2012. That response deadline was subsequently extended by agreement of the parties

23

to October 18, 2012. On October 18, 2012, D&K filed a motion to dismiss LS&Co.’s complaint for

24

lack of personal jurisdiction. The hearing on that motion is currently set for this Friday, November 30,

25

2012.

26

The parties have been engaged in settlement discussions leading up to and since the filing of

27

LS&Co.’s complaint, and believe they are close to a resolution of this dispute. In order to allow the

28

parties to continue their discussions and in the hope of reaching an amicable resolution, the parties
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER

-1-

Levi Strauss & Co. v. D&K S.r.l.
Case No. CV 12-03792 RMW

1

agree and stipulate that the hearing on D&K’s motion to dismiss be continued for six weeks or until

2

January 11, 2013.

3
4

DATED: November 28, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

5
By: ___/Gia L. Cincone/
Gia L. Cincone
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEVI STRAUSS & CO.

10
11
12

By:

13
14
15
16

/Jeffrey E. Faucette/
Jeffrey E. Faucette
Skaggs Faucette LLP
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 500
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
D&K S.R.L.

17
18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

Dated: ________________________

22

___________________________________
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER

-2-

Levi Strauss & Co. v. D&K S.r.l.
Case No. CV 12-03792 RMW