Pacific Elite Fund, Inc et al v. Perez

Filing 5

INTERIM ORDER re 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and DEADLINE for Consent or Declination to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. Defendants shall file all process, pleadings, and orders served in the underlying state court action no l ater than August 3, 2012. If defendant Jesus Perez wishes to proceed in forma pauperis, he must file a separate application no later than August 3, 2012. All parties who have not already done so shall, no later than August 3, 2012, file either a consent or declination form. Forms are available in the Clerk's Office or at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/24/12. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2012)

Download PDF
1 ** E-filed July 24, 2012 ** 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 For the Northern District of California NOT FOR CITATION 8 United States District Court 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 PACIFIC ELITE FUNDS, INC., Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 JESUS PEREZ; ET AL., 14 15 Defendant. ____________________________________/ No. C12-03805 HRL INTERIM ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DEADLINE FOR CONSENT OR DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE [Re: Docket No. 3] 16 17 On July 20, 2012, defendants Jesus Perez and Natividad Perez removed this action from 18 Santa Cruz County Superior Court. Dkt. No. 1 (“Notice of Removal”). They have not complied with 19 28 U.S.C. § 1446. A defendant or defendants desiring to remove a civil action must file “a notice of 20 removal . . . containing a short and plain statement of the grounds for removal, together with a copy 21 of all process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant or defendants in such action.” 28 22 U.S.C. § 1446(a) (emphasis added). Defendants have not attached any process, pleadings, or orders 23 served in the state court action. Accordingly, the defendants shall file all of the required documents 24 from the state court action no later than August 3, 2012. 25 In addition, only one of the defendants, Natividad Perez, has filed an application to proceed 26 in forma pauperis. Defendants are advised that each defendant must file a separate application, or 27 the defendant who has not filed an application will be obligated to pay the filing fee even if the 28 1 application is granted as to the other defendant. If Jesus Perez intends to file an application to 2 proceed in forma pauperis, he shall file it no later than August 3, 2013. 3 In addition, the parties are reminded that this civil case has been randomly assigned to a 4 magistrate judge for all purposes including trial. Accordingly, all parties who have not yet done so 5 shall, no later than August 3, 2012, file either (1) a Consent to Proceed before a United States 6 Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed before a Magistrate Judge and Request for 7 Reassignment to a United States District Judge. See N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 73-1. The consent and 8 declination forms are available at the Clerk’s Office and may also be obtained from the court’s 9 website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 24, 2012 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 C12-03805 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: 2 Michael James Barsi 3 Notice will be sent by mail to: 4 Jesus C. Perez 727 Lincoln Avenue Watsonville, CA 95076 5 6 7 8 Natividad Perez 727 Lincoln Street Watsonville, CA 95076 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?