Stacy v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

Filing 17

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT. Stipulated Dismissal or Joint Statement due by 1/18/2013. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 1/25/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/20/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 MICHAEL STACY, No. 5:12-cv-03934-EJD Plaintiff, 6 7 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT v. WELLS FARGO BANK, ET AL., Defendant. 9 / United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties, having filed a Notice of Settlement on November 16, 2012 (See Docket Item No. 16), are ordered to appear before the Honorable Edward J. Davila on January 25, 2013 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom No. 4, 5th Floor, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California, 95113, to show cause why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). On or before January 18, 2013, the parties shall file a joint statement in response to the Order to Show Cause setting forth the status of settlement efforts as well as the amount of additional time necessary to finalize and file a dismissal. The Order to Show Cause shall be automatically vacated and the parties relieved of the obligation to file a joint statement if a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) is filed on or before January 18, 2013. All other pretrial deadlines and hearing dates are VACATED and any pending motions are TERMINATED. Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss the action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 20, 2012 EDWARD J. DAVILA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?