Newman v. Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 4

ORDER TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/8/2012. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SUZANNE NEWMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 12-CV-03937-LHK ORDER TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 17 The parties have failed to file a Joint Case Management Statement 7 days in advance of the 18 case management conference set for November 14, 2012, as required by to Civil Local Rule 16-10. 19 Further, Plaintiff has not filed any proof of service. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires 20 that a proof of service be filed within 120 days of the filing of the complaint. The complaint in this 21 action was filed on July 26, 2012. Thus, the proof of service in this case must be filed by 22 November 23, 2012. 23 Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a case management statement by November 9, 2012 at 24 5:00 p.m. If Plaintiff does not also file a proof of service at that time, the case management 25 statement shall address Plaintiff’s plans concerning proof of service. If a proof of service is not 26 filed by November 23, 2012, the Court will issue an Order to show cause why this action should 27 not be dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 4(m). 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 Case No.: 12-CV-3937-LHK ORDER TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 1 Dated: November 8, 2012 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-3937-LHK ORDER TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?