Newman v. Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
4
ORDER TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/8/2012. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
SUZANNE NEWMAN, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
NETWORK EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES )
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No.: 12-CV-03937-LHK
ORDER TO FILE CASE
MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
17
The parties have failed to file a Joint Case Management Statement 7 days in advance of the
18
case management conference set for November 14, 2012, as required by to Civil Local Rule 16-10.
19
Further, Plaintiff has not filed any proof of service. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires
20
that a proof of service be filed within 120 days of the filing of the complaint. The complaint in this
21
action was filed on July 26, 2012. Thus, the proof of service in this case must be filed by
22
November 23, 2012.
23
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a case management statement by November 9, 2012 at
24
5:00 p.m. If Plaintiff does not also file a proof of service at that time, the case management
25
statement shall address Plaintiff’s plans concerning proof of service. If a proof of service is not
26
filed by November 23, 2012, the Court will issue an Order to show cause why this action should
27
not be dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 4(m).
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1
Case No.: 12-CV-3937-LHK
ORDER TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
1
Dated: November 8, 2012
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-3937-LHK
ORDER TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?