Prado v. Federal Express Corporation

Filing 201

VERDICT FORM Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on October 2, 2014 (psglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 JOSE A. PRADO, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 5:12-cv-03945-PSG VERDICT FORM Case No. 5:12-cv-03945-PSG VERDICT FORM VERDICT FORM 1 2 Part A. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT (“ADA”) 3 Disability Discrimination 4 1. Did Jose Prado have a disability? 5 6 7 ___________ Yes ___________ No 2. Could Mr. Prado perform the essential functions of a part-time-handler position with or without reasonable accommodation? 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 ___________ Yes ___________ No 3. Did Mr. Prado suffer an adverse employment action by Federal Express Corporation? ___________ Yes ___________ No 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4. Was Mr. Prado’s disability a motivating factor that prompted the adverse employment action? ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to any or all of Questions 1, 2, 3, or 4, is “No,” then please proceed to Question 11. If your answer to Questions 1, 2, 3 and 4 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 5. 5. Was FedEx’s decision to take adverse employment action against Mr. Prado also substantially motivated by a lawful reason? ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 5 is “No,” then please proceed to Question 7. If your answer to Question 5 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 6. 6. Would FedEx have made the same decision to take adverse employment action against Mr. Prado even if Mr. Prado’s disability had played no role in FedEx’s decision? ___________ Yes ___________ No 27 28 Please proceed to Question 7. 2 Case No. 5:12-cv-03945-PSG VERDICT FORM 1 2 3 Failure to Accommodate Disability 7. Was FedEx an employer? ___________ Yes ___________ No 4 8. Was Mr. Prado an employee of FedEx? 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to either Question 7 or 8, or both, is “No,” then please proceed to Part B. If your answer to both Questions 7 and 8 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 9. 9. Did Mr. Prado have a disability? ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 9 is “No,” then please proceed to Part B. If your answer to Question 9 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 10. 10. Did FedEx know of Mr. Prado’s disability? 14 15 16 17 18 ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 10 is “No,” then please proceed to Part B. If your answer to Question 10 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 11. 11. Was Mr. Prado able to perform the essential job duties with reasonable accommodation for his disability? 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 11 is “No,” then please proceed to Part B. If your answer to Question 11 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 12. 12. Did FedEx fail to provide reasonable accommodation for Mr. Prado’s disability? ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 12 is “No,” then please proceed to Part B. If your answer to Question 12 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 13. 27 28 3 Case No. 5:12-cv-03945-PSG VERDICT FORM 1 13. Was FedEx’s failure to provide reasonable accommodation a substantial factor in causing harm to Mr. Prado? 2 ___________ Yes 3 4 5 ___________ No Please proceed to Part B. Part B. FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING ACT (“FEHA”) 6 Disability Discrimination 7 14. Did Mr. Prado have a disability? 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 ___________ Yes ___________ No 15. Could Mr. Prado perform the essential functions of a part-time-handler position with or without reasonable accommodation? ___________ Yes ___________ No 13 16. Did Mr. Prado suffer an adverse employment action by FedEx? 14 15 16 17 18 ___________ Yes ___________ No 17. Was Mr. Prado’s disability a substantial motivating reason that prompted the adverse employment action? ___________ Yes ___________ No 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 If your answer to any or all of Questions 14, 15, 16 or 17 is “No,” then please proceed to Question 20. If your answer to Questions 14, 15, 16 and 17 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 18. 18. Was FedEx’s decision to take adverse employment action against Mr. Prado also substantially motivated by a lawful reason? ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 18 is “No,” then please proceed to Question 20. If your answer to Question 18 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 19. 26 27 28 4 Case No. 5:12-cv-03945-PSG VERDICT FORM 1 2 3 19. Would FedEx have made the same decision to take adverse employment action against Mr. Prado even if Mr. Prado’s disability had played no role in FedEx’s decision? ___________ Yes ___________ No 4 5 6 Please proceed to Question 20. Failure to Accommodate 7 20. Was FedEx an employer? 8 ___________ Yes ___________ No 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21. Was Mr. Prado an employee of FedEx? ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to either Question 20 or 21, or both, is “No,” then please proceed to Question 27. If your answer to both Questions 20 and 21 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 22. 22. Did Mr. Prado have a disability? ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 22 is “No,” then please proceed to Question 27. If your answer to Question 22 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 23. 18 23. Did FedEx know of Mr. Prado’s disability? 19 20 21 22 23 ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 23 is “No,” then please proceed to Question 27. If your answer to Question 23 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 24. 24. Was Mr. Prado able to perform the essential job duties with reasonable accommodation for his disability? 24 25 26 27 ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 24 is “No,” then please proceed to Question 27. If your answer to Question 24 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 25. 28 5 Case No. 5:12-cv-03945-PSG VERDICT FORM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 25. Did FedEx fail to provide reasonable accommodation for Mr. Prado’s disability? ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 25 is “No,” then please proceed to Question 27. If your answer to Question 25 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 26. 26. Was FedEx’s failure to provide reasonable accommodation a substantial factor in causing harm to Mr. Prado? ___________ Yes ___________ No 8 Please proceed to Question 27. 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 Failure to Engage in the Interactive Process 27. Was FedEx an employer? ___________ Yes ___________ No 28. Was Mr. Prado an employee of FedEx? 14 15 16 17 18 19 ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to either Question 27 or 28, or both, is “No,” then please proceed to Question 34. If your answer to both Questions 27 and 28 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 29. 29. Did Mr. Prado have a disability? ___________ Yes ___________ No 20 21 22 23 If your answer to Question 29 is “No,” then please proceed to Question 34. If your answer to Question 29 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 30. 30. Did Mr. Prado make known to FedEx that he needed a reasonable accommodation for his disability so that he would be able to perform the essential job functions? 24 25 26 27 ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 30 is “No,” then please proceed to Question 34. If your answer to Question 30 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 31. 28 6 Case No. 5:12-cv-03945-PSG VERDICT FORM 1 2 3 31. Was Mr. Prado willing to participate in an interactive process to determine whether reasonable accommodation could be made so that he would be able to perform the essential job functions? ___________ Yes ___________ No 4 5 6 7 8 If your answer to Question 31 is “No,” then please proceed to Question 34. If your answer to Question 31 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 32. 32. Did FedEx fail to participate in a timely, good-faith interactive process with Mr. Prado to determine whether reasonable accommodation could be made? ___________ Yes ___________ No 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 If your answer to Question 32 is “No,” then please proceed to Question 34. If your answer to Question 32 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 33. 33. Was FedEx’s failure to participate in a good-faith interactive process a substantial factor in causing harm to Mr. Prado? ___________ Yes ___________ No 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Please proceed to Question 34. Failure to Prevent Discrimination 34. Did FedEx fail to take all reasonable steps to prevent unlawful discrimination against Mr. Prado? ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 34 is “No,” then please proceed to Part C. If your answer to Question 34 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 35. 35. Was FedEx’s failure to prevent unlawful discrimination a substantial factor in causing harm to Mr. Prado? 23 24 25 ___________ Yes ___________ No Please proceed to Part C. 26 27 28 7 Case No. 5:12-cv-03945-PSG VERDICT FORM 1 2 Part C. PUBLIC POLICY Discharge or Displacement Without Pay in Violation of Public Policy 3 36. Was FedEx an employer? 4 ___________ Yes ___________ No 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 If your answer to Question 36 is “No,” then please proceed to Part D. If your answer to Question 36 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 37. 37. Was Mr. Prado discharged or displaced without pay? ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 37 is “No,” then please proceed to Part D. If your answer to Question 37 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 38. 38. Was Mr. Prado’s disability a substantial motivating reason for FedEx’s decision to discharge or displace him without pay? ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 38 is “No,” then please proceed to Part D. If your answer to Question 38 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 39. 39. Did the discharge or displacement without pay cause Mr. Prado harm? ___________ Yes ___________ No 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 If your answer to Question 39 is “No,” then please proceed to Part D. If your answer to Question 39 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 40. 40. Has FedEx proved that its decision to take adverse employment action against Mr. Prado, including his discharge or displacement without pay, was also substantially motivated by a lawful reason? ___________ Yes ___________ No If your answer to Question 40 is “No,” then please proceed to Part D. If your answer to Question 40 is “Yes,” please proceed directly to Question 41. 27 28 8 Case No. 5:12-cv-03945-PSG VERDICT FORM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 41. Has FedEx proved that it would have made the same decision to take adverse employment action against Mr. Prado, including his discharge or displacement without pay, even if Mr. Prado’s disability had played no role in FedEx’s decision? ___________ Yes ___________ No Please proceed to Part D. Part D. DAMAGES If you answered “No” as to any or all of Questions 5, 6, 18, 19, 40 or 41 or if you answered “Yes” as to any or all of Questions 13, 26, 33 or 35 please proceed directly to Question 42. Otherwise, stop here, answer no further questions, and have the foreperson sign and date this form. 42. What are Mr. Prado’s damages? United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 a. Past economic loss: 11 Lost earnings: $________________ 12 Medical expenses: $________________ Other past economic loss: $________________ Total Past Economic Damages: $________________ 13 14 15 16 17 18 b. Future economic loss: Lost earnings: $________________ Medical expenses: $________________ Other past economic loss: $________________ Total Future Economic Damages: $________________ 19 20 21 22 23 c. Past noneconomic loss, including physical pain/mental suffering: $________________ d. Future noneconomic loss, including physical pain/mental suffering: $________________ 24 TOTAL: $________________ 25 26 Please proceed to Question 43. 27 28 9 Case No. 5:12-cv-03945-PSG VERDICT FORM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?