Miller et al v. Alliance Bankcorp et al

Filing 5

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE TO A U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/24/2013: # 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE) (ofr, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 DAVID WYNN MILLER, et al, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. ALLIANCE BANKCORP, et al, 14 Defendants. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: C 12-4113 PSG ORDER REASSIGNING CASE TO A U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Re: Docket No. 4) 16 On October 16, 2012, the parties failed to appear for a case management conference. As a 17 18 result, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiffs David Wynn Miller, et al, (“Plaintiffs”) to show 19 cause as to why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.1 Plaintiffs were required 20 to respond by November 16, 2012. To date, no response has been filed. Plaintiffs have not 21 consented to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge. 22 Accordingly, the above-captioned action shall be reassigned to a U.S. District Judge with a 23 24 report and recommendation that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 25 26 27 1 28 See Docket No. 4. 1 Case No.: 12-4113 PSG ORDER 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 24, 2013 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-4113 PSG ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?