Miller et al v. Alliance Bankcorp et al
Filing
5
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE TO A U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/24/2013: # 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE) (ofr, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
DAVID WYNN MILLER, et al,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
ALLIANCE BANKCORP, et al,
14
Defendants.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: C 12-4113 PSG
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE TO A
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE; REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
(Re: Docket No. 4)
16
On October 16, 2012, the parties failed to appear for a case management conference. As a
17
18
result, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiffs David Wynn Miller, et al, (“Plaintiffs”) to show
19
cause as to why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.1 Plaintiffs were required
20
to respond by November 16, 2012. To date, no response has been filed. Plaintiffs have not
21
consented to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge.
22
Accordingly, the above-captioned action shall be reassigned to a U.S. District Judge with a
23
24
report and recommendation that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
25
26
27
1
28
See Docket No. 4.
1
Case No.: 12-4113 PSG
ORDER
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 24, 2013
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-4113 PSG
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?