Dailey v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER 23 Dismissing Entire Action With Prejudice. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/30/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

ORRY P. KORB, County Counsel (S.B. #114399)
MARK F. BERNAL, Deputy County Counsel (S.B. #173923)
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, Ninth Floor
San Jose, California 95110-1770
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
AND MARK BEASLEY

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DONALD VICTOR DAILEY, an individual,

No. CV12-04132 RMW

Plaintiff,

12
13

v.

14

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING
ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16
17

Plaintiff DONALD VICTOR DAILEY and Defendants COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and

18

MARK BEASLEY, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to

19

an order dismissing this entire action with prejudice as to all named defendants.
Each side shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs of the suit.

20
21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1
Stipulation and Order Dismissing
Entire Action With Prejudice

Case No. CV12-04132 RMW

I hereby attest that I have on file the holograph signature indicated by a “conformed”

1
2

signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:

3
4

Dated: September 10, 2013

ORRY P. KORB
County Counsel

5

By:

6

/S/
MARK BERNAL
Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
AND MARK BEASLEY

By:

/S/
MAXWELL C. AGHA
Attorney for Plaintiff
DONALD VICTOR DAILEY

7
8
9
10

Dated: September 10, 2013

11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED:

14

Dated:
HON. RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Court Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

731610.DOC

2
Stipulation and Order Dismissing
Entire Action With Prejudice

Case No. CV12-04132 RMW