Navcom Techonology, Inc et al v. OKI Semiconductor America, Inc et al

Filing 363

ORDER RE: HEARING ON NOVEMBER 5, 2014. Each side's total presentation shall be limited to 45 minutes for all motions. The majority of the parties' argument should be focused on Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion for New Trial (Docket Item Nos. 330 , 343 ). The court does not require extensive argument concerning Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs (Docket Item Nos. 332 , 333 ). The parties shall prepare their arguments accordingly. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/4/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 NAVCOM TECHONOLOGY, INC, et al., Case No. 5:12-cv-04175 EJD United States District Court Northern District of California Plaintiffs, 12 ORDER RE: HEARING ON NOVEMBER 5, 2014 v. 13 14 OKI ELECTRIC INDUSTRY CO, LTD, Defendant. 15 16 With regard to the hearing scheduled for November 5, 2014, the court orders as follows: 17 1. Each side’s total presentation shall be limited to 45 minutes for all motions. 18 2. The majority of the parties’ argument should be focused on Plaintiffs’ Renewed 19 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion for New Trial (Docket Item Nos. 330, 343). 20 The court does not require extensive argument concerning Defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a 21 Matter of Law or Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (Docket Item Nos. 332, 333). The parties 22 shall prepare their arguments accordingly. 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 4, 2014 ______________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 27 28 1 Case No.: 5:12-cv-04175 EJD ORDER RE: HEARING ON NOVEMBER 5, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?