Navcom Techonology, Inc et al v. OKI Semiconductor America, Inc et al

Filing 51

ORDER Granting Dismissal of Individual Defendants re 50 Stipulation filed by OKI Data Americas, Inc., OKI Electric America, Inc, LAPIS Semiconductor Co, Ltd, Rohm Semiconductor USA, LLC, ***11/30/2012 Motion Hearings terminated. Motions terminated: 13 MOTION to Remand Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof filed by Deere & Company, Navcom Techonology, Inc, 33 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(B)(6). Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/1/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2012)

7
8
9
10

12
13

RT

ERED

O ORD

IT IS S

dw
J u d ge E

ER

a rd J . D

avila

H

15
16

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

NO

14

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP
BRETT M. SHUMAN (SBN 189247)
[e-mail]
RACHEL M. WALSH (SBN 250568)
[e-mail]
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

RT
U
O

11

Attorneys for Defendants
Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.; Oki Electric America, Inc.,
Oki Data Americas, Inc., Rohm Semiconductor USA, LLC and
Lapis Semiconductor Co., Ltd.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
NavCom Technology, Inc. and Deere & Company

R NIA

6

FO

5

LI

4

A

3

S

2

MICHAEL A. LADRA (Bar No. 64307)
[e-mail]
MATTHEW RAWLINSON (Bar No. 231890)
[e-mail]
ALLISON S. DAVIDSON (Bar No. 267964)
[e-mail]
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

UNIT
ED

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

11/2/2012

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN JOSE DIVISION

21

NAVCOM TECHNOLOGY, INC.; and
DEERE & COMPANY,

22
23
24
25
26
27

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 5:12-cv-04175-EJD
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

vs.
OKI SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA, INC.;
OKI ELECTRIC INDUSTRY CO., LTD.; OKI
DATA AMERICAS, INC.; OKI ELECTRIC
AMERICA, INC.; LAPIS
SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.; ROHM
SEMICONDUCTOR USA, LLC, and DOES
ONE THROUGH TEN inclusive,
Defendants.

28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VA LLE Y

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 5:12-cv-04175-EJD

1

WHEREAS, on June 22, 2012, Plaintiffs NavCom Technology, Inc. and Deere &

2

Company (“Plaintiffs”) commenced this action in the Superior Court of the State of California in

3

and for the County of Santa Clara by filing a Complaint for Damages for Breach of Contract

4

(“Complaint”);

5

WHEREAS, on August 8, 2012, Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. (“Oki Japan”) filed a

6

Notice of Removal of this case from the Superior Court of Santa Clara County to the United

7

States District Court for the Northern District of California;

8

WHEREAS, on September 7, 2012, Plaintiffs moved to remand this case;

9

WHEREAS, on September 21, 2012, Defendants Oki Data Americas, Inc. (“ODA”), Oki

10

Electric America, Inc. (“OEA”), Rohm Semiconductor USA, LLC (“RSU”) and Lapis

11

Semiconductor Co., Ltd. (“LSC”) moved to dismiss the Complaint against them;

12

WHEREAS, attached hereto as Exhibit A, Oki Japan has provided to Plaintiffs a

13

Declaration of Isao Goto, confirming that it is the successor under the contract at issue in the

14

Complaint, for matters at issue in the above-captioned action;

15

WHEREAS, all of the defendants presently named in the Complaint hereby agree that

16

any and all requests for production of documents directed at Oki Japan in the above-captioned

17

action will be treated as a request for production of documents to all of the defendants presently

18

named in the Complaint;

19

WHEREAS, in light of Oki Japan’s submission of the aforementioned Declaration

20

confirming that Oki Japan is the successor to the contract, Plaintiffs have agreed to voluntarily

21

dismiss the remaining defendants presently named in the Complaint;

22

WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, the parties agree that Plaintiffs’ pending Motion to

23

Remand (Dkt. 13) and Defendants ODA, OEA, RSU, and LSC’s pending Motion to Dismiss

24

(Dkt. 33) are hereby moot;

25

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the undersigned parties, that

26

pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that the Complaint is dismissed

27

without prejudice as to Defendants Oki Semiconductor America, Inc., Oki Data Americas, Inc.,

28
2
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VA LLE Y

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 5:12-cv-04175-EJD

1

Oki Electric America, Inc., Lapis Semiconductor Co., Ltd., and Rohm Semiconductor USA,

2

LLC.

3
4
5

SO STIPULATED.
The Clerk shall close this file.
Dated: October 31, 2012

LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP

6
By:_____/s/_Michael A. Ladra_________
Michael A. Ladra

7
8

Attorneys for Defendants
Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.
Oki Electric America, Inc.
Rohm Semiconductor USA, LLC
Oki Data Americas, Inc.
Lapis Semiconductor Co., Ltd.

9
10
11
12
13

Dated: October 31, 2012

14

MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP
By:

15

/s/ Brett M. Schuman
Brett M. Schuman

Attorneys for Plaintiffs NavCom Technology, Inc.
and Deere & Company

16
17
18
19
20

CIVIL L.R. 5-1(i)(3) ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE OF SIGNATORIES
Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the electronic filing of this
document has been obtained from the other signatories.

21
22

Dated: October 31, 2012

LATHAM & WATKINS, LLP

23
24

By:______ /s/_Michael A. Ladra _______
Michael A. Ladra

25
Attorneys for Defendants
26
27
28
3
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SILICON VA LLE Y

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 5:12-cv-04175-EJD