Navcom Techonology, Inc et al v. OKI Semiconductor America, Inc et al

Filing 55

Order Granting 54 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 11/13/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2012)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NavCom Technology, Inc.;
and Deere & Company
Plaintiff(s),

CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
XXXXXXX
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

v.
Oki Electric Industry Co.,
LTD.
Defendant(s).
I

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
El
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
u
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
u
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
nivate Process:
Private ADR (please identibi process and provider) private mediation
provided by JAMS, AAA, or similar provider.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline 180 days from the date of the order.

Dated:

Dated:

(
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER
XXXXXXX

XX
u
u

Dated:

The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

November 13, 2012
MAGISTRATE FUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2