Navcom Techonology, Inc et al v. OKI Semiconductor America, Inc et al

Filing 59

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (MODIFIED BY THE COURT). Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on January 24, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013)

Download PDF
*E-FILED: January 24, 2013* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP BRETT M. SCHUMAN (SBN 189247) bschuman@morganlewis.com RACHEL M. WALSH (SBN 250568) rwalsh@morganlewis.com One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, California 94105-1126 Telephone: 415.442.1000 Facsimile: 415.442.1001 Attorneys for Plaintiffs NavCom Technology, Inc., and Deere & Company MICHAEL A. LADRA (SBN 64307) mike.ladra@lw.com MATTHEW RAWLINSON (SBN 231890) matt.rawlinson@lw.com ALLISON S. DAVIDSON (SBN 267964) allison.davidson@lw.com LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 140 Scott Drive Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 328-4600 Facsimile: (650) 463-2600 Attorneys for Defendant Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 NAVCOM TECHNOLOGY, INC.; and DEERE & COMPANY, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 Case No. 5:12-cv-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (MODIFIED BY THE COURT) v. 14 15 OKI ELECTRIC INDUSTRY CO., LTD.; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 19 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 20 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 21 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 22 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated 23 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on 24 all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 25 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 26 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 27 14.4, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential 28 information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62 set forth the procedures that MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER ATTORNEYS AT LAW S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 1 must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the 2 court to file material under seal. 3 2. 4 5 6 DEFINITIONS 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 7 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 8 of Civil Procedure 26(c). 9 10 11 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 12 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 13 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 14 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 15 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 16 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 17 responses to discovery in this matter. 18 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 19 the litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or 20 as a consultant in this action, (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s 21 competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party 22 or of a Party’s competitor. 23 2.7 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or 24 Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another 25 Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by 26 less restrictive means. 27 28 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 2.9 entity not named as a Party to this action. 3 4 2.10 2.11 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel (and their support staffs). 7 8 Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action. 5 6 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 9 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 10 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 11 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 12 subcontractors. 13 14 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 15 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 16 Producing Party. 17 3. 18 SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 19 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; 20 (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 21 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 22 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 23 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a 24 Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as 25 a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the 26 public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party 27 prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating 2 Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 3 4. DURATION 4 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by 5 this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court 6 order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all 7 claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after 8 the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, 9 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to 10 11 12 applicable law. For a period of six months after final disposition of this litigation, this court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this order. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party 13 or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care 14 to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. 15 To the extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party must designate for protection only 16 those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that 17 other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not 18 warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 19 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are 20 shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to 21 unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary 22 expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 23 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated 24 for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection 25 initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is 26 withdrawing the mistaken designation. 27 28 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so 2 designated before the material is disclosed or produced. 3 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 4 (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, 5 but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing 6 Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 7 EYES ONLY” to each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the 8 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 9 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for 10 11 each portion, the level of protection being asserted. A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection 12 need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which 13 material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all 14 of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 15 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants 16 copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, 17 qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the 18 Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 19 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) to each page that contains Protected 20 Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the 21 Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 22 markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being 23 asserted. 24 (b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, 25 that the Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or 26 other proceeding, all protected testimony and specify the level of protection being asserted. When 27 it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection and it 28 appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Designating MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 5 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Party may invoke on the record (before the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding is concluded) 2 a right to have up to 21 days to identify the specific portions of the testimony as to which 3 protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted. Only those portions of 4 the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the 21 days shall be covered 5 by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. Alternatively, a Designating Party may 6 specify, at the deposition or up to 21 days afterwards on written notice, that the entire transcript 7 shall be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 8 ONLY.” 9 Parties shall give the other parties notice if they reasonably expect a deposition, hearing or 10 other proceeding to include Protected Material so that the other parties can ensure that only 11 authorized individuals who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” 12 (Exhibit A) are present at those proceedings. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition 13 shall not in any way affect its designation as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 14 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 15 Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the title page 16 that the transcript contains Protected Material, and the title page shall be followed by a list of all 17 pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as Protected Material and 18 the level of protection being asserted by the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall 19 inform the court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript that is prepared before the 20 expiration of a 21-day period for designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been 21 designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in its entirety unless 22 otherwise agreed. After the expiration of that period, the transcript shall be treated only as 23 actually designated. 24 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for 25 any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the 26 container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” 27 or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only a portion or portions of 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 6 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall 2 identify the protected portion(s) and specify the level of protection being asserted. 3 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to 4 designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s 5 right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a 6 designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is 7 treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 8 6. 9 CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of 10 confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality 11 designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic 12 burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to 13 challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the 14 original designation is disclosed. 15 6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution 16 process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis 17 for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written 18 notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this 19 specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in 20 good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other 21 forms of communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In 22 conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality 23 designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the 24 designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, 25 to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next 26 stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or 27 establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in 28 a timely manner. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 7 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 3 Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court parties shall comply with the undersigned's Standing Order re Civil intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under Discovery Disputes Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, if 4 applicable) within 21 days of the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties 5 agreeing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Each Any Discovery Dispute Joint Report shall affirm that such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has have been satisfied. complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure by ^ seek judicial intervention the Designating Party to make such a motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or 2 6 7 8 9 6.3 10 14 days, if applicable) shall automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each seek relief with respect to challenged designation. In addition, the Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a 11 confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing so, including a challenge to 12 the designation of a deposition transcript or any portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to 13 this provision must be accompanied by a competent declaration affirming that the movant has 14 complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph. 15 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating 16 Party. Frivolous challenges and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose 17 unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to 18 19 sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to seek relief file a motion to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the 20 material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s 21 designation until the court rules on the challenge. 22 7. 23 ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or 24 produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, 25 defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to 26 the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has 27 been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 15 below (FINAL 28 DISPOSITION). MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 8 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and 2 in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 3 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered 4 by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any 5 information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: 6 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel in this action, as well as employees 7 of said Outside Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this 8 litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is 9 attached hereto as Exhibit A; 10 (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the 11 Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have 12 signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 13 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom 14 disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment 15 and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 16 (d) the court and its personnel; 17 (e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and 18 Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have 19 signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 20 (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is 21 reasonably necessary and who is (i) the author of the original source of the “CONFIDENTIAL” 22 material, (ii) an actual or intended recipient of the “CONFIDENTIAL” material, (iii) someone for 23 whom there is a reasonable basis to believe has previously seen or received the 24 “CONFIDENTIAL” material, (iv) or who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to 25 Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. 26 Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material 27 must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as 28 permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 9 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 3 (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 4 Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the 5 Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY 6 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to: 7 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel in this action, as well as employees 8 of said Outside Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this 9 litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is 10 attached hereto as Exhibit A; 11 (b) House Counsel of the Receiving Party to whom it is reasonably necessary 12 to disclose the information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and 13 Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; 14 (c) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably 15 necessary for this litigation, (2) who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be 16 Bound” (Exhibit A), and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.4(a)(1), below, 17 have been followed; 18 (d) the court and its personnel; 19 (e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and 20 Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have 21 signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); and 22 23 24 25 (f) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 7.4 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” to Experts 26 (a) (1) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to in writing by the 27 Designating Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an Expert (as defined in this Order) any 28 information or item that has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 10 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 EYES ONLY” pursuant to paragraph 7.3(c) first must make a written request to the Designating 2 Party that (1) identifies the general categories of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 3 EYES ONLY” information that the Receiving Party seeks permission to disclose to the Expert, 4 (2) sets forth the full name of the Expert and the city and state of his or her primary residence, 5 (3) attaches a copy of the Expert’s current resume, (4) identifies the Expert’s current employer(s), 6 (5) identifies each person or entity from whom the Expert has received compensation or funding 7 for work in his or her areas of expertise or to whom the expert has provided professional services, 8 including in connection with a litigation, at any time during the preceding five years, and 9 (6) identifies (by name and number of the case, filing date, and location of court) any litigation in 10 connection with which the Expert has offered expert testimony, including through a declaration, 11 report, or testimony at a deposition or trial, during the preceding five years. 12 (b) A Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the 13 preceding respective paragraphs may disclose the subject Protected Material to the identified 14 Expert unless, within 14 days of delivering the request, the Party receives a written objection 15 from the Designating Party. Any such objection must set forth in detail the grounds on which it is 16 based. 17 (c) A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with 18 the Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve the matter by 19 20 agreement within seven days of the written objection. If no agreement is reached, the Party parties shall comply with the undersigned's Standing Order re Civil Discovery Disputes. seeking to make the disclosure to the Expert may file a motion as provided in Civil Local Rule 7 21 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, if applicable) seeking 22 permission from the court to do so. Any such motion must describe the circumstances with 23 specificity, set forth in detail the reasons why the disclosure to the Expert is reasonably necessary, 24 assess the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail, and suggest any additional means that 25 could be used to reduce that risk. In addition, any such motion must be accompanied by a 26 competent declaration describing the parties’ efforts to resolve the matter by agreement (i.e., the 27 extent and the content of the meet and confer discussions) and setting forth the reasons advanced 28 by the Designating Party for its refusal to approve the disclosure. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 11 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 In any such proceeding, the Party opposing disclosure to Designated House Counsel or the 2 Expert shall bear the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail 3 (under the safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the Protected 4 Material to its Designated House Counsel or Expert. 5 8. 6 7 PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels 8 disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” or 9 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” [that Party must: 10 11 (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; 12 (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to 13 issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is 14 subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated 15 Protective Order; and 16 17 18 (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the 19 subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as 20 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” before a 21 determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained 22 the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of 23 seeking protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in these provisions 24 should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a 25 lawful directive from another court. 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 12 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION 2 (a) 3 The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non- 4 Party in this action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 5 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with 6 this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these 7 provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections. (b) 8 In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to 9 produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an 10 agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the 11 Party shall: 1. 12 promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party 13 that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non- 14 Party; 2. 15 promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated 16 Protective Order in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific 17 description of the information requested; and 3. 18 19 make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party. (c) 20 If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court 21 within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may 22 produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non- 23 Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its 24 possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a 25 determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the 26 burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material. See 27 Paragraph 14. 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 13 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected 2 3 Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective 4 Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the 5 unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the 6 Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were 7 made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the 8 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 9 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIAL 10 When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently 11 12 produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the 13 Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This 14 provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery 15 order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of 16 Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a 17 communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product 18 protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order 19 submitted to the court. 20 12. 21 22 23 MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the court in the future. 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective 24 Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any 25 information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no 26 Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered 27 by this Protective Order. 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 14 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 12.3 Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party 2 or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in 3 the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 4 Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62. Protected 5 Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the 6 specific Protected Material at issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, a 7 sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing that the Protected Material at issue is 8 privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a 9 Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79- 10 5(d) and General Order 62 is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the Protected 11 Material in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) unless otherwise instructed by 12 the court. 13 13. 14 FINAL DISPOSITION Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4, each 15 Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such 16 material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, 17 compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected 18 Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must 19 submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the 20 Designating Party) by the 60-day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all 21 the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has 22 not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or 23 capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to 24 retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, 25 legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work 26 product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected 27 Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to 28 this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION). MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 15 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 14. In the event of any discovery or disclosure dispute, the parties and any affected non-parties shall comply with the undersigned's Standing Order re Civil Discovery Disputes. IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 2 3 ~-~-[_f<;, _ _ --#----##---~----"'--'-------~ _ DATED: ----=!-+-/-'--{ I 4 5 DATED: -------'--\\--\-\-~~\')=----- ---'------'---\ \ Attorneys for Defendant AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 ^ 8 DATED: _________________________________________________ January 24, 2013 Hon. Edward l Davila United States District Judge 9 10 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & !lOcK! US LLP ATIORNEYSATLAW 16 SAN F~ANCt'>CO DB2/ 23805227 .l CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 EXHIBIT A 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 3 I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of 4 _________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read 5 in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States 6 District Court for the Northern District of California on [date] in the case of Navcom Technology, 7 Inc. et al. v. Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. et al., Case No. 5:12-cv-04175-EDJ. I agree to comply 8 with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and 9 acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature 10 of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item 11 that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict 12 compliance with the provisions of this Order. 13 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for 14 the Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated 15 Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. 16 I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of 17 _______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone 18 number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any 19 proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 20 21 Date: _________________________________ 22 City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ 23 Printed name: ______________________________ [printed name] 24 25 Signature: __________________________________ [signature] 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 17 S AN FRANCISCO DB2/ 23805227.1 CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04175 EJD STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?