Nguyen et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

Filing 10

ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A "CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE," OR ELSE A "DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT." Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on September 10, 2012. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 SON T. NGUYEN, ET AL., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) ) JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No.: C 12-04183 PSG ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A “CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE,” OR ELSE A “DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT” 17 18 On September 4, 2012, Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. filed a motion to dismiss the 19 complaint. This case has been assigned to a Magistrate Judge. Before the court takes any further 20 action in the case, the court must determine whether or not all of the parties who have appeared 21 consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, or whether any of the parties request reassignment to a 22 District Judge. Therefore, 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than September 17, 2012, each party who has not 24 already done so shall file either a “Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge,” or 25 else a “Declination to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge and Request for 26 Reassignment.” Both forms are available from the clerk of the court, or from the Forms (Civil) 27 28 Case No.: C 12-04183 PSG ORDER RE CONSENT 1 1 section of the court’s website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. 2 Dated: 9/10/2012 PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: C 12-04183 PSG ORDER RE CONSENT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?