Cheema v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 17

Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time to File(rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2013)

JAMES HUNT MILLER (St.BarCal.# 135160)
P.O. Box 10891
2 OAKLAND CA 94610
P:[phone]
3 F:[phone]
e:[e-mail]
1

4

Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11

Amtul Nasee Cheema,
Plaintiff,

12
13

vs.

Commissioner of the
Social Security
15 Administration,
14

16

Defendant.
____________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 12-4208 RMW

PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED
MOTION FOR EXTENSION
(with proposed order)

17
18

MOTION.

19

Plaintiff hereby requests additional time in which to file Plaintiff’s Motion for

20

Summary Judgment. Pursuant to the time allowed in the Procedural Order (28 days

21

from service of administrative record), F.R.Civ.P. Rules 6(e) and 5(e) (3 days), and

22

service of the record on December 18, Plaintiff’s Motion was to be filed by today,

23

January 18, 2013. Plaintiff seeks a 28-day extension, or until February 15, 2013.

24

Such extension would push Defendant’s motion-filing deadline, and submission of the

25

case, as much as 28 days later.

26

Defendant, through counsel Patrick Snyder, stated (by e-mail) to Plaintiff’s

27

counsel that Defendant does not oppose this request. Plaintiff submits and requests

28

that no hearing is necessary in this motion, as is usual in Social Security litigation (per
Plf’s Req xtn – Cheema v. SSA

– NDCA 12-4208 RMW

1

1

the Procedural Order), and also because Defendant would not be harmed by the

2

extension and Defendant does not oppose the request.

3

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on this 18th day of January, 2013.

4

/s/_________________________________________
James Hunt Miller, Attorney for Plaintiff

5
6
7

ORDER (PROPOSED)

8

PURSUANT TO PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION, IT IS ORDERED

9

that Plaintiff may have a 28-day extension, or through February 15, 2013, in which

10

to file a motion for summary judgment.

11
12
13

January 23, 2013
DATE: ___________________

__________________________________
United States Senior District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plf’s Req xtn – Cheema v. SSA

– NDCA 12-4208 RMW

2