Campbell v. Feld Entertainment, Inc et al
Filing
138
AMENDED ORDER REFERRING CASE TO JUDGE LUCY H. KOH FOR CONSIDERATION OF RELATED CASE STATUS re 137 Order. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above-entitled action is referred to the Honorable Lucy H. Koh for a determination as to whether this case is related to any of the following cases currently pending before Judge Koh: Campbell v. Feld Entertainment Inc., Case No. 5:12-cv-04233 LHK, Ennis v. Feld Entertainment Inc., Case No. 5:13-cv-00233 LHK, and Cuviello v. Feld Entertainment Inc., Case No. 5:13-cv-03135 LHK. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/11/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-04951 EJD
JOSEPH CUVIELLO,
11
AMENDED ORDER REFERRING CASE
TO JUDGE LUCY H. KOH FOR
CONSIDERATION OF RELATED CASE
STATUS
Plaintiff(s),
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
v.
FELD ENTERTAINMENT INC., et. al.,
14
Defendant(s).
15
16
/
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the above-entitled action is referred to the Honorable
17
Lucy H. Koh for a determination as to whether this case is related to any of the following cases
18
currently pending before Judge Koh: Campbell v. Feld Entertainment Inc., Case No. 5:12-cv-04233
19
LHK, Ennis v. Feld Entertainment Inc., Case No. 5:13-cv-00233 LHK, and Cuviello v. Feld
20
Entertainment Inc., Case No. 5:13-cv-03135 LHK.1
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated: February 11, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
1
28
This amended order corrects the incorrect case number included on the original referral
order filed on February 10, 2014.
1
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-04951 EJD
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO JUDGE LUCY H. KOH FOR CONSIDERATION OF RELATED CASE STATUS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?