Campbell v. Feld Entertainment, Inc et al
Filing
328
FEDERAL INJUNCTION LIMITING INSTRUCTION. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/10/2015. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
SHANNON CAMPBELL,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and
MICHAEL STUART,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
MARK ENNIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and
MICHAEL STUART,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case Nos.: 12-CV-04233-LHK
13-CV-00233-LHK
FEDERAL INJUNCTION LIMITING
INSTRUCTION
22
23
24
Dated: February 10, 2015
_______________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
1
Case Nos.: 12-CV-04233-LHK; 13-CV-00233-LHK
FEDERAL INJUNCTION LIMITING INSTRUCTION
1
2
3
4
EVIDENCE FOR LIMITED PURPOSE
Some evidence may be admitted for a limited purpose only.
When I instruct you that an item of evidence has been admitted for a limited purpose, you must
consider it only for that limited purpose and for no other.
5
6
7
Source: Ninth Circuit Model Civil Jury Instructions – 1.8 (2007 Edition)
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case Nos.: 12-CV-04233-LHK; 13-CV-00233-LHK
FEDERAL INJUNCTION LIMITING INSTRUCTION
1
FEDERAL INJUNCTION LIMITING INSTRUCTION
2
In August 2009, animal rights activists Joseph Cuviello and Deniz Bolbol obtained an injunction in
federal court allowing them and a limited number of people acting in concert with them, including
Plaintiffs, to conduct activity such as videotaping, leafletting, or otherwise protesting near the
Oracle Arena (“Arena”) in Oakland, California.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
Under the injunction operating at the time of the August 7, 2012 animal walk held in Oakland,
Plaintiffs were allowed access to the following areas to conduct activity:
(1) A three-foot “walkway” running along the outside of the chain link fence that encloses
the truck corral;
(2) The barricaded corridor leading to the animal compound, the area outside of but directly
adjacent to the corridor, and the gap between the corridor and the animal compound
entrance except that there shall be a ten-foot buffer zone surrounding the entrance of the
compound; (Plaintiffs could be temporarily moved from the gap to permit movement of
equipment and animals.)
(3) The upper west landing area, up to the point where the west ramp joins the landing;
(4) One specific spot located in the area adjacent to the entrance to the north tunnel, which
has a clear view of the entire tunnel;
(5) The north ramp and landing;
(6) The northeast stairs and base of the stairs; and
(7) All exterior areas of the Arena and parking lot which are otherwise open to the public.
The injunction was legally binding against the City of Oakland, Alameda County, the OaklandAlameda County Coliseum Authority, and the Oakland Coliseum Joint Venture LLC, among
others. Feld Entertainment, Inc. and Michael Stuart were not legally bound by that injunction.
16
17
18
You may consider the existence and parameters of the injunction only insofar as you find it
relevant to whether a reasonable person with knowledge of the injunction would have found any of
the alleged touchings or threatened touchings sustained by Plaintiffs to be offensive and/or whether
Defendants, if they were aware of the injunction, acted with malice towards Plaintiffs.
19
20
21
Source: Cuviello v. City of Oakland, No. C-06-5517 EMC, 2012 WL 5628325, at *1-2, *5 (N.D.
Cal. Nov. 15, 2012) (describing the August 2009 injunction and the August 2010 modification
thereto).
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case Nos.: 12-CV-04233-LHK; 13-CV-00233-LHK
FEDERAL INJUNCTION LIMITING INSTRUCTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?