Campbell v. Feld Entertainment, Inc et al

Filing 333

ORDER RULING ON DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/12/2015. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 SHANNON CAMPBELL, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and MICHAEL STUART, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 MARK ENNIS, Plaintiff, v. FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and MICHAEL STUART, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case Nos.: 12-CV-04233-LHK 13-CV-00233-LHK ORDER RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS 22 23 24 25 Defendants have filed objections to Plaintiffs’ deposition designations for David Bailey (“Bailey”). ECF No. 331. Plaintiffs have opposed. ECF No. 332. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case, and balancing the 26 considerations set forth in Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the Court rules on 27 Defendants’ objections as follows: 28 1 Case Nos.: 12-CV-04233-LHK; 13-CV-00233-LHK ORDER RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS 1 2 3 4 5 Defendants’ Objections Bailey Deposition at 43:1-14 Bailey Deposition at 52:10-53:25 Bailey Deposition at 54:9-18 Bailey Deposition at 82:1-84:4 Bailey Deposition at 107:18-108:13 Ruling Sustained. Sustained. Sustained. Overruled. Sustained. IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: February 12, 2015 _______________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case Nos.: 12-CV-04233-LHK; 13-CV-00233-LHK ORDER RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?