Emeterio et al v. Ashron Construction & Restoration, Inc et al

Filing 29

ORDER Dismissing Defendant Bay Area Rapid Transit Without Prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/22/2013. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED: February 22, 2013* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 No. C12-04296 HRL JOSHUA EMETERIO and JOHN P. FISCHER, For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 v. ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT WITHOUT PREJUDICE ASHRON CONSTRUCTION & RESTORATION, INC.; SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, a municipal organization; and SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. / 18 19 On February 12, 2013, the parties appeared for an initial Case Management Conference. 20 The discussion at the conference indicated that defendant Bay Area Rapid Transit District 21 (BART) is not necessary to these proceedings, and plaintiffs stated their willingness to dismiss 22 their claims as to that defendant. The court advised that, within a week after the conference, it 23 would issue an order dismissing BART without prejudice, unless plaintiffs told the court 24 otherwise. The court having received no information as to why BART should remain in this 25 action, BART is hereby dismissed without prejudice. 26 27 28 SO ORDERED. Dated: February 22, 2013 ________________________________ HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 5:12-cv-04296-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Dawna Jeanne Cilluffo 3 Tomas Eduardo Margain Tomas@LaCasaLegal.com, brisa@lacasalegal.com, crronan@gmail.com, huy@lacasalegal.com, margainlaw@hotmail.com dawna@dclawcorp.com 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?