Emeterio et al v. Ashron Construction & Restoration, Inc et al
Filing
29
ORDER Dismissing Defendant Bay Area Rapid Transit Without Prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/22/2013. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2013)
1
2
*E-FILED: February 22, 2013*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
No. C12-04296 HRL
JOSHUA EMETERIO and JOHN P. FISCHER,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
v.
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
ASHRON CONSTRUCTION &
RESTORATION, INC.; SAN FRANCISCO
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, a
municipal organization; and SURETEC
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants.
/
18
19
On February 12, 2013, the parties appeared for an initial Case Management Conference.
20
The discussion at the conference indicated that defendant Bay Area Rapid Transit District
21
(BART) is not necessary to these proceedings, and plaintiffs stated their willingness to dismiss
22
their claims as to that defendant. The court advised that, within a week after the conference, it
23
would issue an order dismissing BART without prejudice, unless plaintiffs told the court
24
otherwise. The court having received no information as to why BART should remain in this
25
action, BART is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
26
27
28
SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 22, 2013
________________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
5:12-cv-04296-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Dawna Jeanne Cilluffo
3
Tomas Eduardo Margain Tomas@LaCasaLegal.com, brisa@lacasalegal.com,
crronan@gmail.com, huy@lacasalegal.com, margainlaw@hotmail.com
dawna@dclawcorp.com
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?