Winningham v. K.D.F., Inc Pro-Cision Machining/Manufacturing , et al

Filing 9

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on October 4, 2012. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2012)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LARRY WINNINGHAM,
CASE NO. CU-043-15-HRL
Plaintiff(s),
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

v.

K.D.F. INC., eta!.,
Defendant(s):

---------~/
-

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3S:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

0

0
1ZJ

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form, They must instead file a Notice ofNeed for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
,..f.fivate Process:
U
Private ADR (please identifY process and provider) - - - - - - - - -

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the· case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

D.

0

other requested deadline _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _..,;._ _ _ _ _ __

Dated: J0/3/20 12
Attorney for Plainf

\Jc~r
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

X
D
D

Dated:

The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

October 4, 2012
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed· Order Selecting Mediation."

Rev. 12111
Page 2 of2