Sanchez et al v. Sterling Real Estate Partners II

Filing 5

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/16/2014. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 12 13 14 15 ALONSO SANCHEZ and ANABERTHA SANCHEZ, Plaintiffs, v. 16 17 18 19 STERLING REAL ESTATE PARTNERS II, Defendant. Case No.: 12-CV-4368-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 20 On August 20, 2012, Defendant Sterling Real Estate Partners II filed a motion for order 21 withdrawing reference of adversary proceeding. ECF No. 1. On September 25, 2012, Plaintiffs 22 filed an opposition to the request. ECF No. 2. There have been no further filings or proceedings in 23 this case. On August 9, 2013, the parties were ordered to file a joint status report by August 23, 24 2013, advising the Court of the status of this case. ECF No. 3. The parties did not do so. 25 On April 9, 2014, the parties were ordered to file a status update by April 14, 2014 at 26 12p.m. ECF No. 4. The Court advised that if no response was filed, this case would be dismissed 27 with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Id. No response has been filed as of April 16, 2014. 28 1 Case No.: 12-CV-4067 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 1 Accordingly, this case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. The clerk shall close the 2 case file. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: April 16, 2014 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-4067 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?