Agnir v. The Gryphon Solutions, LLC et al
Filing
47
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 46 Stipulation to Amend Briefing Schedule.(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2013)
Case5:12-cv-04470-LHK Document46 Filed03/21/13 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
Fred W. Schwinn (SBN 225575)
CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC.
12 South First Street, Suite 1014
San Jose, California 95113-2418
Telephone Number: (408) 294-6100
Facsimile Number: (408) 294-6190
Email Address: fred.schwinn@sjconsumerlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
ELIZABETH PALISOC AGNIR
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ELIZABETH PALISOC AGNIR,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE GRYPHON SOLUTIONS, LLC, a
California limited liability company;
MICHAEL CHARLES BRKICH, individually
and in his official capacity; JAY MICHAEL
TENENBAUM, individually and in his official
capacity; IAN NATHAN WILLENS,
individually and in his official capacity,
18
19
20
21
Case No. 5:12-CV-04470-LHK-HRL
STIPULATION TO AMEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
[N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 6-2]
Defendants.
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1.
On August 24, 2012, Plaintiff filed her Complaint (Doc. 1) in this case alleging
22
violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., and the Rosenthal Fair
23
Debt Collection Practices Act, Cal. Civil Code § 1788 et seq. Plaintiff’s Complaint also seeks actual
24
25
26
27
28
damages, statutory damages, declaratory and injunctive relief, attorney fees, and costs pursuant to Cal.
Civil Code §§ 1798.92-1798.97.
2.
On September 24, 2012, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss for Failure to
State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Doc. 16).
-1STIPULATION TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 5:12-CV-04470-LHK-HRL
Case5:12-cv-04470-LHK Document46 Filed03/21/13 Page2 of 3
1
3.
On September 25, 2012, Defendants filed their Motion to Strike (Doc. 17).
2
4.
Plaintiff filed her Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 26) and Opposition to
3
the Motion to Strike (Doc. 27) on October 22, 2012.
4
5.
6
9
File First Amended Complaint and Withdrawing Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike
(Doc. 36).
10
7.
15
Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Doc. 43) and a Motion to Strike Pursuant to FRCP 12(b),
FRCP 12(f) and CCP § 425.16.
16
9.
17
18
Defendants motions are currently set for hearing on July 18, 2013, at 1:30 p.m.
before the Honorable Lucy H. Koh (Doc. 45).
10.
19
20
On March 18, 2013, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a
40).
13
14
Thereafter, on March 4, 2013, Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint (Doc.
8.
11
12
On February 20, 2013, the parties filed a Stipulation and Order Granting Leave to
34 and 35).
7
8
Thereafter, On February 1, 2013, Defendants engaged their current counsel. (Docs.
6.
5
The parties request that the Court enter an order modifying the briefing schedule
for Defendants’ motions as follows:
21
a.
b.
22
23
Plaintiff’s opposition briefs shall be filed on or before May 10, 2013.
Defendants’ reply briefs shall be filed on or before May 31, 2013.
11.
25
26
The modified briefing schedule will have no effect on the July 18, 2013, hearing
date.
27
The briefing schedule has not been previously modified.
12.
24
///
28
-2STIPULATION TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 5:12-CV-04470-LHK-HRL
Case5:12-cv-04470-LHK Document46 Filed03/21/13 Page3 of 3
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
1
2
CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC.
3
4
Dated: March 21, 2013
5
6
7
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
8
9
By: /s/ Fred W. Schwinn
Fred W. Schwinn, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
ELIZABETH PALISOC AGNIR
Dated: March 21, 2013
10
11
12
13
By: /s/ Keith M. White
Keith M. White, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants
THE GRYPHON SOLUTIONS, LLC,
MICHAEL CHARLES BRKICH,
JAY MICHAEL TENENBAUM,
and IAN NATHAN WILLENS
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
17
Dated:
March 22, 2013
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case No. 5:12-CV-04470-LHK-HRL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?