Agnir v. The Gryphon Solutions, LLC et al
Filing
67
ORDER dismissing with prejudice. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 11/15/2013. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
THE GRYPHON SOLUTIONS, LLC a
)
California Limited Liability Company;
MICHAEL CHARLES BRKICH, individually )
)
and in his official capacity; JAY MICHAEL
TENENBAUM, individually and in his official )
)
capacity; IAN NATHAN WILLENS,
)
individually and in his official capacity,
)
)
Defendants.
)
ELIZABETH PALISOC AGNIR,
Case No.: 12-CV-04470-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE
The Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Agnir’s complaint in its entirety. ECF No.
66. In that Order, the Court held, “Should Agnir elect to file an amended complaint curing the
deficiencies discussed herein with respect to the second and third causes of action, she shall do so
within 30 days of the date of this Order. Failure to meet the 30-day deadline to file an amended
complaint or failure to cure deficiencies identified in this Order will result in a dismissal with
prejudice.” Id. at 29. Agnir has failed to file an amended complaint within the 30-day deadline.
Accordingly, the Court dismisses Agnir’s complaint with prejudice. The Clerk shall close the case file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1
Case No.: 12-CV-04470-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
1
Dated: November 15, 2013
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-04470-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?