Agnir v. The Gryphon Solutions, LLC et al

Filing 67

ORDER dismissing with prejudice. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 11/15/2013. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) THE GRYPHON SOLUTIONS, LLC a ) California Limited Liability Company; MICHAEL CHARLES BRKICH, individually ) ) and in his official capacity; JAY MICHAEL TENENBAUM, individually and in his official ) ) capacity; IAN NATHAN WILLENS, ) individually and in his official capacity, ) ) Defendants. ) ELIZABETH PALISOC AGNIR, Case No.: 12-CV-04470-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE The Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Agnir’s complaint in its entirety. ECF No. 66. In that Order, the Court held, “Should Agnir elect to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies discussed herein with respect to the second and third causes of action, she shall do so within 30 days of the date of this Order. Failure to meet the 30-day deadline to file an amended complaint or failure to cure deficiencies identified in this Order will result in a dismissal with prejudice.” Id. at 29. Agnir has failed to file an amended complaint within the 30-day deadline. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Agnir’s complaint with prejudice. The Clerk shall close the case file. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 Case No.: 12-CV-04470-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE 1 Dated: November 15, 2013 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-04470-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?