Kotsinsh et al v. Greenpoint Morgage Funding Incorporation et al

Filing 16

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS TO DEFENDANT GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on December 13, 2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
IMANT KOTSINSH and DAVID-WYNN
MILLER,

)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE, a California
)
Corporation; GREENPOINT FUNDING
)
INCORPORATED, a New York Corporation; )
FINANCIAL TITLE COMPANY, a California )
Corporation; MARIN CONVEYANCING
)
CORPORATION, “as Trustee”; AURORA
)
LOAN SERVICES, LLC; AURORA BANK;
)
FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, A COLORADO )
CORPORATION; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC )
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. “MERS”- )
A/K/A MERS CORPORATION,
)
INCORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; )
AKERMAN SENTERFITT, LLP, a California )
Limited Liability Partnership Company; IMRAN )
HAYAT, ESQ., an Individual; TAYLOR L.
)
BROADHEAD, ESQ., an Individual; JUSTIN D. )
BASLER, ESQ., an Individual; TFLG
)
CORPORATION, a California Corporation;
)
ERIC FERNANDEZ, ESQ., an Individual;
)
SEAN BEDROSIAN, ESQ., an Individual;
)
LAURIE HOWELL, ESQ., an Individual; CAL- )
WESTERN RECONVEYANCE
)
CORPORATION, “as Trustee”,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No.: 12-cv-04636-LHK
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED AS TO DEFENDANT
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING,
INC.

1
Case No.: 12-cv-04636-LHK
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT
BE DISMISSED AS TO DEFENDANT GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.

On November 26, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause why this case should not

2

be dismissed as to Defendant Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. for failure to prosecute. See ECF

3

No. 21 (“OSC”). Plaintiffs were ordered to file a response to the OSC by December 10, 2012. Id.

4

The Order to Show Cause was never mailed to Plaintiffs. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ deadline to file a

5

response to the OSC is hereby extended from December 10, 2012 to December 27, 2012. The

6

hearing on this OSC will take place on January 2, 2013 at 2:00 P.M. as previously scheduled.

7

Should Plaintiffs fail to respond to the OSC or fail to appear at the January 2, 2013 hearing,

8

Plaintiffs’ case will be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute as to Defendant Greenpoint

9

Mortgage Funding, Inc.

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12

Dated: December 13, 2012

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No.: 12-cv-04636-LHK
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT
BE DISMISSED AS TO DEFENDANT GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.