Farahani v. Floria et al

Filing 55

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 54 Motion for Extension of Time to File (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 FRED FARMAHIN FARAHANI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) RONALD A. FLORIA, ADOLFO SALAZAR, ) PLM LENDER SERVICES, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Case No.: 12-CV-04637-LHK ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME On April 19, 2013, this Court GRANTED Defendant Floria’s motion to dismiss, and gave 17 Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint consistent with that order within 21 days, i.e., May 10, 18 2013. ECF No. 46. 19 On May 6, 2013, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Request Extension of Time from 21 Days as 20 per Order of Docket #46 and Docket #50 to Amend My Motions of Malicious Abuse of Process.” 21 ECF No. 54. Plaintiff states that he cannot comply with the May 10, 2013 deadline due to his 22 disability, and requests that the deadline be extended until May 24, 2013. 23 The Court construes Plaintiff’s motion as a request to extend time to file Plaintiff’s 24 amended complaint, and GRANTS the motion. The Court cautions Plaintiff that by May 24, 2013, 25 he must submit a full amended complaint (and not merely a “Motion of Malicious Abuse of 26 Process”), that addresses with specificity the issues raised in the Court’s order granting Defendant 27 Floria’s motion to dismiss. 28 1 Case No.: 12-CV-04637-LHK ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: May 8, 2013 3 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-04637-LHK ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?