Abdelfattah v. Carringhton Mortgage Services, LLC

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER 34 to Continue Briefing Schedule on Carrington Mortgage's Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/24/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2013)

Download PDF
1 BUCKLEYSANDLER LLP DONNA L. WILSON (SBN 186984) 2 JOHN W. MCGUINNESS (SBN 277322) dwilson@buckleysandler.com 3 jmcguinness@buckleysandler.com 100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1000 4 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Phone (310) 424-3900 5 Fax (310) 424-3960 6 Attorneys for Defendant CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 AHMED ABDELFATTAH, an individual Case No. 5:12-cv-04656-RMW 13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING 14 v. SCHEDULE ON CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC’S 15 CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES MOTION TO STRIKE LLC, a limited liability corporation, 16 [Declaration of John W. McGuinness filed Defendant. concurrently herewith] 17 Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte 18 19 20 STIPULATION 21 WHEREAS, at the Case Management Conference held on March 29, 2013, the Court 22 directed defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC (“CMS”) to file a motion to strike on April 23 18, 2013 (the “Motion”), and set a hearing date for that motion on May 24, 2013; 24 WHEREAS, pursuant to the briefing schedule set by the Court, Plaintiff Ahmed 25 Abdelfattah’s (“Plaintiff”) deadline to file his brief opposing the Motion is May 2, 2013, and 26 CMS’s deadline to file a reply brief in support of the Motion is May 9, 2013; 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC’S MOTION TO STRIKE CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04656-RMW 1 WHEREAS, should the [proposed] order pursuant to this Stipulation be granted, the current 2 hearing date of May 24, 2013 will be unaffected; 3 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and CMS, by and through their respective counsel of record, 4 do hereby stipulate to request an order from the Court, pursuant to Local Civil Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, 5 extending the deadlines for the opening brief on the Motion, opposition to the Motion, and reply 6 brief in support of the Motion as follows: 7 8 9 10 11 12 1. The deadline to file the opening brief in support of the Motion is continued from April 18, 2013 to and including April 19, 2013; 2. The deadline to file the brief in opposition to the Motion is continued from May 2, 2013 to and including May 3, 2013; and 3. The deadline to file a reply brief in support of the Motion is continued from May 9, 2013 to and including May 10, 2013. 13 SO STIPULATED. 14 Dated: April 17, 2013 15 CONSUMER LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM E. KENNEDY 16 By:________/s/______________________ WILLIAM E. KENNEDY Attorneys for Plaintiff Ahmed Abdelfattah 17 18 19 20 21 Dated: April 17, 2013 BUCKLEYSANDLER LLP 22 23 24 25 By: :________/s/______________________ DONNA L. WILSON JOHN W. MCGUINNESS Attorneys for Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC’S MOTION TO STRIKE CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04656-RMW 1 [] ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that 3 4 5 6 7 8 1. The deadline to file the opening brief in support of the Motion is continued from April 18, 2013 to and including April 19, 2013; 2. The deadline to file the brief in opposition to the Motion is continued from May 2, 2013 to and including May 3, 2013; and 4. The deadline to file a reply brief in support of the Motion is continued from May 9, 2013 to and including May 10, 2013. 9 SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 Dated: ______________ ________________________________ Honorable Ronald M. Whyte Senior District Judge United States District Court 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC’S MOTION TO STRIKE CASE NO. 5:12-CV-04656-RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?