In Re: Constance Dudley Laub
Filing
6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy 8001. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/2/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2013)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
SAN JOSE DIVISION
5
IN RE:
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-04715 EJD
6
CONSTANCE DUDLEY LAUB,
(Appeal from In re Constance Dudley Laub),
Bankr. N.D. Cal. (San Jose) Case No. 12-53835
SLJ)
7
Debtor.
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
8
9
/
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
On September 7, 2012, the Court ordered Appellant to show cause in writing by July 31,
13
2013, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution because the record had not
14
appeared on the District Court docket. See Docket Item No. 5. The court ordered Appellant to
15
investigate the whereabouts of the record and file a declaration detailing her efforts. The court
16
further admonished Appellant that this action would be dismissed with prejudice should she fail to
17
respond.
18
As of this date, Appellant has not complied with the show cause order as directed.
19
Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution pursuant to
20
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy 8001. The Clerk shall close
21
this file.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: August 2, 2013
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-04715 EJD
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?