Lockett v. Diaz
Filing
7
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/6/12. (Attachments: # 1 cert of service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ELLIS LORENZO LOCKETT,
11
Petitioner,
12
vs.
13
14
RALF DIAZ,
15
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 12-4781 LHK (PR)
ORDER OF TRANSFER
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner at Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, in Corcoran,
18
California, seeks federal habeas review of the execution of his state sentence. Specifically, he is
19
challenging a decision made by the Board of Parole Hearings. Venue is proper in a habeas
20
action in either the district of conviction or the district of confinement. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).
21
But the district of confinement is the preferable forum to review the execution of a sentence. See
22
Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Because
23
Substance Abuse Treatment Facility lies in the Eastern District of California, the Court orders
24
that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and Habeas Local Rule 2254-3(b), and in the interest of
25
justice, this petition be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
26
California.
27
28
Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of California, the district in which Petitioner is currently confined. See 28
Order of Transfer
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\HC.11\Lockett781trans.wpd
1
U.S.C. § 1404(a); Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(1). The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions
2
and transfer the entire file to the Eastern District of California.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11/6/12
DATED: _______________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order of Transfer
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\HC.11\Lockett781trans.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?