Lockett v. Diaz

Filing 7

ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/6/12. (Attachments: # 1 cert of service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELLIS LORENZO LOCKETT, 11 Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 14 RALF DIAZ, 15 Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 12-4781 LHK (PR) ORDER OF TRANSFER 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner at Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, in Corcoran, 18 California, seeks federal habeas review of the execution of his state sentence. Specifically, he is 19 challenging a decision made by the Board of Parole Hearings. Venue is proper in a habeas 20 action in either the district of conviction or the district of confinement. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). 21 But the district of confinement is the preferable forum to review the execution of a sentence. See 22 Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Because 23 Substance Abuse Treatment Facility lies in the Eastern District of California, the Court orders 24 that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and Habeas Local Rule 2254-3(b), and in the interest of 25 justice, this petition be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 26 California. 27 28 Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, the district in which Petitioner is currently confined. See 28 Order of Transfer G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\HC.11\Lockett781trans.wpd 1 U.S.C. § 1404(a); Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(1). The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions 2 and transfer the entire file to the Eastern District of California. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11/6/12 DATED: _______________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order of Transfer G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\HC.11\Lockett781trans.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?