Garden Meadow, Inc. et al v. Grocery Outlet, Inc.

Filing 29

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 24 Stipulation selecting Private ADR.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2012)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GARDEN MEADOW, INC., a Connecticut Corporation Plaintiff(s), CASE NO. 5:12-cv-04811-LHK (PSG) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS GROCERY OUTLET, INC., a California Corporation doing business as GROCERY OUTLET and as IDEAL DISTRIBUTING and JOHN DOES Numbers 1 through 99 Defendant(s). / Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties agree to private mediation but have not yet reached agreement on a provider The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) other requested deadline American LegalNet, Inc. [PROPOSED] ORDER X The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2012 LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2 American LegalNet, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?