Gonzalez v. De La Torree et al
Filing
10
STIPULATION AND ORDER dismissing case with prejudice. The clerk shall close the file. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on July 22, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2013)
*E-FILED: July 22, 2013*
1
2
3
4
5
6
Cris C. Vaughan SBN 99568
VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES
6207 South Walnut Street, Suite 800
Loomis, CA 95650
Telephone: 916-660-9401
Facsimile: 916-660-9378
Email: ccvaughan@sbcglobal.net
Attorney for Plaintiff,
ADRIAN SANCHEZ GONZALEZ
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ADRIAN SANCHEZ GONZALEZ,
12
CASE NO.: CV-12-04843-HRL
STIPULATED DISMISSAL;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
{FRCP 41 (a)(1)}
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
16
17
18
JUAN RAMON DE LA TORRE,
Individually and d/b/a SUPER
TAQUERIA; JUAN MANUEL DE LA
TORRE PROPERTIES, LLC, a California
limited liability company; and DOES 150,
19
Complaint Filed: September 14, 2012
Defendants.
20
21
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through
22
their designated counsel that this action be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice
23
pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(1). The Parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees in
24
connection with the Lawsuit and the negotiation and preparation of this Agreement.
25
///
-1STIPULATED DISMISSAL
1
Dated: July 19, 2013
VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES
2
3
By:
4
5
_/s/ Cris C. Vaughan
___
CRIS C. VAUGHAN
Attorney for Plaintiff ADRIAN SANCHEZ
GONZALEZ
6
7
Dated: July 19, 2013
EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ATTORNEYS
8
9
By:
10
11
/s/ Richard D. Schramm
_
RICHARD D. SCHRAMM
Attorney for Defendants SUPER TAQUERIA, et
al.
12
ORDER
13
14
15
16
17
18
The parties having so stipulated,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its
entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
Dated:
July 22, 2013
United States District Judge
United States Magistrate Judge
Howard R. Lloyd
22
23
24
25
-2STIPULATED DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?