P.S. Products, Inc et al v. iOffer, Inc
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time to respond to complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on December 7, 2012. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DARRYL M. WOO (CSB No. 100513)
dwoo@fenwick.com
RYAN J. MARTON (CSB No. 223979)
rmarton@fenwick.com
LESLIE A. KRAMER (CSB No. 253313)
lkramer@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415.875.2300
Facsimile:
415.281.1350
*E-FILED: December 7, 2012*
Attorneys for Defendant
iOFFER, INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
LAW
AT
SAN FRA NCI S CO
ATTO RNEY S
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13
14
P.S. PRODUCTS, INC., an Arkansas
corporation, and BILLY PENNINGTON, an
individual,
15
Plaintiffs,
Case No.: 12-cv-4933 HRL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
16
v.
17
iOFFER, INC., a California corporation,
18
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs P.S. Products and Billy Pennington (collectively, “P.S. Products”)
filed the above-captioned case on or about September 20, 2012;
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2012 Plaintiffs P.S. Products, Inc. and Billy Pennington
24
(collectively, “P.S. Products”) and Defendant iOffer, Inc. (“iOffer”) (collectively, the “Parties”)
25
filed a Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond until December 3, 2012 to allow the Parties time to
26
discuss the possibility of early settlement;
27
28
WHEREAS, on October 26, 2012 the Court issued an Order extending iOffer’s time to
respond until December 3, 2012;
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 12CV-4933 HRL
1
1
WHEREAS, the Parties are currently negotiating settlement;
2
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs P.S. Products, Inc. and Billy Pennington (collectively, “P.S.
3
Products”) and Defendant iOffer, Inc. (“iOffer”) have agreed that the time for iOffer to answer or
4
otherwise respond to plaintiff’s compliant is extended until December 17, 2012;
5
WHEREAS, this Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by P.S. Products or iOffer of any
6
defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of subject
7
matter jurisdiction, improper venue, sufficiency of process or service of process;
8
9
10
LAW
AT
SAN FRA NCI S CO
12
ATTO RNEY S
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP
11
Now, therefore, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6 and 7-12, the Parties, by and through their
respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The deadline for iOffer to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff’s compliant is
extended until December 17;
2. All other deadlines shall remain the same.
13
14
15
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: November 30, 2012
FENWICK & WEST LLP
16
17
By:
/s/ Ryan J. Marton
Ryan J. Marton
Attorneys for Defendant
iOFFER, INC.
18
19
20
21
Dated: November 30, 2012
STEWART LAW FIRM
22
23
24
25
By:
/s/ Chris H. Stewart
Chris H. Stewart
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
P.S. PRODUCTS, INC. and
BILLY PENNINGTON
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 12CV-4933 HRL
2
1
2
PROPOSED ORDER
Pursuant to Stipulation, it is SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
Dated: December 7, 2012
Honorable Howard R. Lloyd
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
LAW
AT
SAN FRA NCI S CO
12
ATTO RNEY S
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 12CV-4933 HRL
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?