Quach v. Bank of America et al
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Because Plaintiff dismissed another federal action based on or including the same claim, this voluntary dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(B). The clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/11/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2013)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
SAN JOSE DIVISION
5
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-05037 EJD
ANH QUACH,
6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Plaintiff(s),
7
8
v.
[Docket Item No(s). 10]
BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, et. al.,
9
10
Defendant(s).
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
/
11
12
On February 8, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of this action pursuant
13
to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). See Docket Item No. 10. Accordingly, this case
14
is DISMISSED.
15
However, because Plaintiff dismissed another federal action “based on or including the same
16
claim,”1 this voluntary dismissal “operates as an adjudication on the merits” pursuant to Federal
17
Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(B).
18
The clerk shall close this file.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
Dated: February 11, 2013
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
28
The previously-dismissed action is Quach v. Bank of America, National Association, Case
Number 5:12-cv-04611 PSG. Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed that action on September 24, 2012.
1
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-05037 EJD
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?