Knapp v. Noreen Cardinale

Filing 76

STIPULATION AND ORDER 73 Extending Time for Opposition and Reply Briefing Re: Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time for Completion of Discovery. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/19/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2013)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

SAN JOSE DIVISION

4
5
6
7

KEITH CHARLES KNAPP, et al.
Plaintiffs,
v.
NOREEN CARDINALE,
Defendant.

8

Case No. C-12-05076 RMW
STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR OPPOSITION
AND REPLY BRIEFING RE: PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY

9
10

Counsel have met and conferred regarding plaintiffs’ motion to extend time for

11

completion of discovery, and defendant’s counsel’s notices of unavailability during the time

12

when defendant’s opposition papers would be filed and served, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, due

13

to the fact that plaintiffs’ motion was filed on November 11, 2013. Counsel have agreed to

14

stipulate to extend the opposition and reply briefing schedule on plaintiffs’ motion as an

15

accommodation of defendant’s counsel’s lack of availability in November and plaintiff’s

16

counsel’s absence in the first week of December. Accordingly the parties, through their

17

respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:

18

Plaintiffs’ motion to extend the time for completion of discovery has been served and

19

filed on November 11, 2013, and is set for hearing on December 20, 2013. Defendant’s

20

opposition papers shall be filed and served no later than December 2, 2013. Plaintiffs’ reply

21

papers shall be filed and served no later December 12, 2013. Defendant intends to file an

22

administrative request, along with this stipulation, seeking an order to modify the time limits of

23

Local Rule 7-3(a) and (c) in accordance with this stipulation.

24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation
Case No. C-12-05076

Page 2

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED:

2
3

November 15, 2013

_/s/ Martha L Caron____________
Martha L Caron
Attorney for Defendant/Judgment Creditor Noreen
Cardinale

November 15, 2013

__/s/Joseph A. Garofolo_____________
Attorney for Plaintiffs Keith Charles Knapp, as
Trustee of the California Home Loans
Profit Sharing Plan, the Trust for the California
Home Loans Profit Sharing Plan, as a fiduciary of
the California Home Loans Profit Sharing Plan, and
Therese A. Lavoie, as a participant in the California
Home Loans Profit Sharing Plan

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

ORDER

13
14

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED (Local Rule 7-12):

15

Defendant may file its Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Discovery Cutoff on

16

or prior to December 2, 2013; Plaintiff may file Reply on or prior to December 12, 2013 and

17
18
19

the hearing thereon shall be on December 20, 2013.
Dated: ________________, 2013

20
21

___________________________________________
HON. RONALD M. WHYTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SR JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation
Case No. C-12-05076

Page 3