Knapp v. Noreen Cardinale

Filing 76

STIPULATION AND ORDER 73 Extending Time for Opposition and Reply Briefing Re: Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time for Completion of Discovery. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/19/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2013)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 5 6 7 KEITH CHARLES KNAPP, et al. Plaintiffs, v. NOREEN CARDINALE, Defendant. 8 Case No. C-12-05076 RMW STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFING RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY 9 10 Counsel have met and conferred regarding plaintiffs’ motion to extend time for 11 completion of discovery, and defendant’s counsel’s notices of unavailability during the time 12 when defendant’s opposition papers would be filed and served, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, due 13 to the fact that plaintiffs’ motion was filed on November 11, 2013. Counsel have agreed to 14 stipulate to extend the opposition and reply briefing schedule on plaintiffs’ motion as an 15 accommodation of defendant’s counsel’s lack of availability in November and plaintiff’s 16 counsel’s absence in the first week of December. Accordingly the parties, through their 17 respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows: 18 Plaintiffs’ motion to extend the time for completion of discovery has been served and 19 filed on November 11, 2013, and is set for hearing on December 20, 2013. Defendant’s 20 opposition papers shall be filed and served no later than December 2, 2013. Plaintiffs’ reply 21 papers shall be filed and served no later December 12, 2013. Defendant intends to file an 22 administrative request, along with this stipulation, seeking an order to modify the time limits of 23 Local Rule 7-3(a) and (c) in accordance with this stipulation. 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation Case No. C-12-05076 Page 2 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED: 2 3 November 15, 2013 _/s/ Martha L Caron____________ Martha L Caron Attorney for Defendant/Judgment Creditor Noreen Cardinale November 15, 2013 __/s/Joseph A. Garofolo_____________ Attorney for Plaintiffs Keith Charles Knapp, as Trustee of the California Home Loans Profit Sharing Plan, the Trust for the California Home Loans Profit Sharing Plan, as a fiduciary of the California Home Loans Profit Sharing Plan, and Therese A. Lavoie, as a participant in the California Home Loans Profit Sharing Plan 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ORDER 13 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED (Local Rule 7-12): 15 Defendant may file its Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Discovery Cutoff on 16 or prior to December 2, 2013; Plaintiff may file Reply on or prior to December 12, 2013 and 17 18 19 the hearing thereon shall be on December 20, 2013. Dated: ________________, 2013 20 21 ___________________________________________ HON. RONALD M. WHYTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SR JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation Case No. C-12-05076 Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?