Knapp v. Noreen Cardinale
Filing
76
STIPULATION AND ORDER 73 Extending Time for Opposition and Reply Briefing Re: Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time for Completion of Discovery. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/19/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2013)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN JOSE DIVISION
4
5
6
7
KEITH CHARLES KNAPP, et al.
Plaintiffs,
v.
NOREEN CARDINALE,
Defendant.
8
Case No. C-12-05076 RMW
STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR OPPOSITION
AND REPLY BRIEFING RE: PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY
9
10
Counsel have met and conferred regarding plaintiffs’ motion to extend time for
11
completion of discovery, and defendant’s counsel’s notices of unavailability during the time
12
when defendant’s opposition papers would be filed and served, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, due
13
to the fact that plaintiffs’ motion was filed on November 11, 2013. Counsel have agreed to
14
stipulate to extend the opposition and reply briefing schedule on plaintiffs’ motion as an
15
accommodation of defendant’s counsel’s lack of availability in November and plaintiff’s
16
counsel’s absence in the first week of December. Accordingly the parties, through their
17
respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:
18
Plaintiffs’ motion to extend the time for completion of discovery has been served and
19
filed on November 11, 2013, and is set for hearing on December 20, 2013. Defendant’s
20
opposition papers shall be filed and served no later than December 2, 2013. Plaintiffs’ reply
21
papers shall be filed and served no later December 12, 2013. Defendant intends to file an
22
administrative request, along with this stipulation, seeking an order to modify the time limits of
23
Local Rule 7-3(a) and (c) in accordance with this stipulation.
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation
Case No. C-12-05076
Page 2
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED:
2
3
November 15, 2013
_/s/ Martha L Caron____________
Martha L Caron
Attorney for Defendant/Judgment Creditor Noreen
Cardinale
November 15, 2013
__/s/Joseph A. Garofolo_____________
Attorney for Plaintiffs Keith Charles Knapp, as
Trustee of the California Home Loans
Profit Sharing Plan, the Trust for the California
Home Loans Profit Sharing Plan, as a fiduciary of
the California Home Loans Profit Sharing Plan, and
Therese A. Lavoie, as a participant in the California
Home Loans Profit Sharing Plan
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
ORDER
13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED (Local Rule 7-12):
15
Defendant may file its Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Discovery Cutoff on
16
or prior to December 2, 2013; Plaintiff may file Reply on or prior to December 12, 2013 and
17
18
19
the hearing thereon shall be on December 20, 2013.
Dated: ________________, 2013
20
21
___________________________________________
HON. RONALD M. WHYTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SR JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation
Case No. C-12-05076
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?