Knapp v. Noreen Cardinale
Filing
97
ORDER continuing pretrial conference to June 26, 2014 and trial to July 21, 2014. Signed by Judge Ronald M Whyte on March 12, 2014. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
KEITH CHARLES KNAPP, as Trustee of the
California Home Loans Profit Sharing Plan;
TRUST FOR THE CALIFORNIA HOME
LOANS PROFIT SHARING PLAN, as a
fiduciary of the California Home Loans Profit
Sharing Plan; THERESE A. LAVOIE, as a
participant in the California Home Loans Profit
Sharing Plan,
16
17
Case No. C-12-05076-RMW
ORDER RE: SCHEDULE
[Re Docket Nos. 95, 96]
Plaintiffs,
v.
18
NOREEN CARDINALE, an individual,
19
Defendant.
20
21
On February 21, 2014 the court held a case management conference to discuss the impact of
22
a Contra Costa Superior Court ruling and the filing of a bankruptcy petition on this case. The court
23
asked the parties to submit briefs addressing these issues. The parties submitted their briefs on
24
February 28. Dkt. Nos. 95 (defendant’s brief), 96 (plaintiffs’ brief). Having reviewed the briefs, the
25
court continues the pretrial conference and trial for four months.
26
The pretrial conference will be set for June 26, 2014 and trial will be set for July 21, 2014.
27
The parties will promptly inform the court as to whether the Contra Costa ruling is appealed
28
and of any relevant developments in the bankruptcy proceeding.
ORDER
Case No. C-12-05076-RMW
LRM
-1-
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: March 12, 2014
_________________________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
Case No. C-12-05076-RMW
LRM
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?